Seek Returns logo

RDDT vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RDDT and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRDDTUBER
Company NameReddit, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesIndustrials
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization37.86 billion USD207.04 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 21, 2024May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RDDT and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RDDT vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRDDTUBER
5-Day Price Return0.68%2.76%
13-Week Price Return38.89%2.73%
26-Week Price Return108.76%42.13%
52-Week Price Return187.18%33.10%
Month-to-Date Return-12.04%1.34%
Year-to-Date Return23.77%64.59%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.39M14.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.12M18.52M
3-Month Volatility65.58%28.35%
Beta2.111.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RDDT

9.93%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

RDDT’s Return on Equity of 9.93% is on par with the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RDDT

12.97%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

RDDT’s Net Profit Margin of 12.97% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RDDT

7.87%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

RDDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.87% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRDDTUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)9.93%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.04%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.97%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.87%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)91.04%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RDDT

12.00

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

RDDT’s Current Ratio of 12.00 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RDDT

0.00

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, RDDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RDDT

--

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

Interest Coverage Ratio data for RDDT is currently unavailable.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRDDTUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)12.001.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)11.890.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

RDDT vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RDDT vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RDDT

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RDDT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RDDT

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RDDT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRDDTUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RDDT

175.00

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

At 175.00, RDDT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UBER

16.43

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 16.43 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RDDT

22.70

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

RDDT’s P/S Ratio of 22.70 is in the upper echelon for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.38

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.38, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RDDT

11.64

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

RDDT’s P/B Ratio of 11.64 is in the upper tier for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RDDT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRDDTUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)175.0016.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)22.704.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.648.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)95.4024.29