Seek Returns logo

RBLX vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RBLX and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRBLXZM
Company NameRoblox CorporationZoom Communications Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEntertainmentSoftware
Market Capitalization85.06 billion USD24.23 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 10, 2021April 18, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RBLX and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RBLX vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRBLXZM
5-Day Price Return6.84%10.65%
13-Week Price Return43.63%2.61%
26-Week Price Return96.29%-1.87%
52-Week Price Return179.24%13.52%
Month-to-Date Return-10.95%9.33%
Year-to-Date Return112.06%-0.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.02M5.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.00M2.97M
3-Month Volatility49.59%33.68%
Beta1.620.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RBLX

-354.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ZM

11.97%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 11.97% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RBLX

-23.67%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ZM

22.31%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.31% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RBLX

-27.35%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ZM

18.13%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.13% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRBLXZM
Return on Equity (TTM)-354.27%11.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)-13.06%9.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-23.67%22.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-27.35%18.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.01%75.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RBLX

0.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZM

4.57

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.57 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RBLX

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RBLX

-845.00

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRBLXZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.974.57
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.964.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.850.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-845.007.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

RBLX vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RBLX vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRBLXZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RBLX

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.

ZM

21.69

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 21.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RBLX

20.42

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

With a P/S Ratio of 20.42, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ZM

4.84

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/S Ratio of 4.84 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RBLX

202.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZM

2.66

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.66 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RBLX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRBLXZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--21.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)20.424.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)202.012.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)87.2113.36