RBLX vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 3, 2025

Here’s a clear look at RBLX and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	RBLX	TTWO
Company Name	Roblox Corporation	Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Communication Services	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Entertainment	Entertainment
Market Capitalization	93.63 billion USD	47.25 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	March 10, 2021	April 15, 1997
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RBLX and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RBLX vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	RBLX	TTWO
5-Day Price Return	4.05%	5.83%
13-Week Price Return	31.67%	6.39%
26-Week Price Return	129.49%	19.67%
52-Week Price Return	213.54%	68.81%
Month-to-Date Return	11.18%	10.76%
Year-to-Date Return	139.41%	40.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume	7.33M	2.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume	8.52M	1.90M
3-Month Volatility	50.92%	24.29%
Beta	1.63	1.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RBLX

-354.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 24.06%
Median: 13.69%
Q1: 5.35%
Min: -17.95%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 24.06%
Median: 13.69%
Q1: 5.35%
Min: -17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RBLX

-23.67%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.33%
Q3: 24.40%
Median: 13.94%
Q1: 4.28%
Min: -23.67%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.33%
Q3: 24.40%
Median: 13.94%
Q1: 4.28%
Min: -23.67%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RBLX

-27.35%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 41.77%
Q3: 28.26%
Median: 16.13%
Q1: 8.03%
Min: -3.93%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 41.77%
Q3: 28.26%
Median: 16.13%
Q1: 8.03%
Min: -3.93%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	RBLX	TTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)	-354.27%	-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-13.06%	-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-23.67%	-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-27.35%	-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	78.01%	56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RBLX

0.97

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.76
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.55
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.38

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.76
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.55
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RBLX

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.54
Q3: 0.77
Median: 0.16
Q1: 0.02
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.54
Q3: 0.77
Median: 0.16
Q1: 0.02
Min: 0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RBLX

-845.00

Entertainment Industry

Max: 87.17
Q3: 35.59
Median: 7.06
Q1: 1.13
Min: -44.74

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 87.17
Q3: 35.59
Median: 7.06
Q1: 1.13
Min: -44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	RBLX	TTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.97	1.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.96	1.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.85	0.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-845.00	-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

RBLX vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RBLX vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.90%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.59%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.90%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.59%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 38.45%
Median: 29.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 38.45%
Median: 29.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	RBLX	TTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RBLX

Entertainment Industry

Max: 92.09
Q3: 54.51
Median: 28.92
Q1: 19.75
Min: 2.96

P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.

TTWO

Entertainment Industry

Max: 92.09
Q3: 54.51
Median: 28.92
Q1: 19.75
Min: 2.96

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RBLX

23.10

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.34
Q3: 7.67
Median: 5.06
Q1: 2.72
Min: 0.67

With a P/S Ratio of 23.10, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TTWO

8.16

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.34
Q3: 7.67
Median: 5.06
Q1: 2.72
Min: 0.67

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 8.16 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RBLX

202.01

Entertainment Industry

Max: 22.84
Q3: 10.54
Median: 6.60
Q1: 2.30
Min: 0.65

At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 22.84
Q3: 10.54
Median: 6.60
Q1: 2.30
Min: 0.65

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RBLX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	RBLX	TTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	23.10	8.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	202.01	12.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	98.68	210.39