Seek Returns logo

RACE vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RACE and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

RACE is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolRACEVIPS
Company NameFerrari N.V.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryItalyChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization83.48 billion USD8.51 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 21, 2015March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RACE and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RACE vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRACEVIPS
5-Day Price Return6.15%2.62%
13-Week Price Return-8.16%19.53%
26-Week Price Return-12.25%17.18%
52-Week Price Return-3.29%35.91%
Month-to-Date Return5.22%14.38%
Year-to-Date Return-1.70%28.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.34M2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.32M3.20M
3-Month Volatility31.96%27.56%
Beta1.010.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RACE

45.61%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

RACE’s Return on Equity of 45.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RACE

22.91%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

RACE’s Net Profit Margin of 22.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RACE

29.16%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

RACE’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRACEVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)45.61%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.76%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.91%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.16%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.20%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RACE

2.08

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

RACE’s Current Ratio of 2.08 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RACE

0.89

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

RACE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RACE

181.49

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 181.49, RACE demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRACEVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.081.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.611.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.890.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)181.49150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

RACE vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RACE vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RACE

0.67%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RACE

44.33%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.33% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRACEVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.33%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RACE

48.99

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 48.99, RACE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RACE

11.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.23, RACE trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RACE

22.78

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 22.78, RACE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RACE vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRACEVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.997.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.230.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)22.781.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)57.47--