QSR vs. TCOM: Restaurant Brands vs. Trip.com Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though QSR is classified under Restaurants while TCOM falls under Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines.

Restaurant Brands (QSR) trades as ordinary local shares, while Trip.com (TCOM) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM)
Profile Item	QSR	TCOM
Name	Restaurant Brands International Inc.	Trip.com Group Limited American Depositary Receipt
Country/Region	United States	Singapore
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry Group	Consumer Services	Consumer Services
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
GICS Sub-Industry	Restaurants	Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines
Market Capitalization	35.56 billion USD	27.94 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	Nasdaq
Listing Date	December 11, 2014	December 9, 2003
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

QSR

TCOM

GSPC

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM)
Metric	QSR	TCOM
Total Return (1Y)	19.01%	-37.31%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	7.95%	9.55%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	9.80%	7.80%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

QSR

TCOM

GSPC

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Trip.com (TCOM) reports a negative beta of -0.04, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Restaurant Brands (QSR) has a non-negative beta of 0.54.

Risk profile metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM)
Metric	QSR	TCOM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	24.79%	35.10%
Beta (5Y)	0.54	-0.04
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-24.53%	-51.93%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.91M	3.13M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

QSR and TCOM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM)
Metric	QSR	TCOM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.59	-1.18
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.89	-1.41

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 39.05% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Trip.com (TCOM) at 15.65% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for QSR.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

39.05%

Max: 76.75%
QSR: 39.05%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

15.65%

Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
TCOM: 15.65%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their ROE against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Trip.com (TCOM) at 36.91% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 15.35% also retains a top-quartile share.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

15.35%

Max: 25.52%
QSR: 15.35%
Q3: 12.95%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

36.91%

TCOM: 36.91%
Max: 25.52%
Q3: 12.95%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their net margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Trip.com (TCOM) reports a negative operating margin of -9.33%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Restaurant Brands (QSR) reports 27.92%, ranking against industry peers normally.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

27.92%

Max: 49.05%
QSR: 27.92%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
Q1: 5.67%
Min: -16.47%

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

-9.33%

Max: 49.05%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
Q1: 5.67%
TCOM: -9.33%
Min: -16.47%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM)
Metric	QSR	TCOM
ROE (TTM)	39.05%	15.65%
ROA (TTM)	6.48%	2.59%
Net Margin (TTM)	15.35%	36.91%
Operating Margin (TTM)	27.92%	-9.33%
Gross Margin (TTM)	34.33%	80.05%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Trip.com (TCOM) at 17.10% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 12.23% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for TCOM.

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Trip.com (TCOM) at 92.37% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at -26.10% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for TCOM.

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM)
Metric	QSR	TCOM
Revenue Growth (YoY)	12.23%	17.10%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	13.19%	46.04%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-26.10%	92.37%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-10.24%	181.37%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 0.96 and Trip.com (TCOM) at 1.33 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

0.96

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
QSR: 0.96
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.22

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

1.33

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
TCOM: 1.33
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.22

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Trip.com (TCOM) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 2.84 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

2.84

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
QSR: 2.84
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

0.17

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.37
TCOM: 0.17
Min: 0.01

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM)
Metric	QSR	TCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.96	1.33
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	2.84	0.17
Net Debt / EBITDA	4.98	-4.60

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Trip.com (TCOM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Restaurant Brands (QSR) reports a yield of 3.27%, ranking against industry peers normally.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

3.27%

Max: 4.10%
QSR: 3.27%
Q3: 1.82%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

0.00%

Max: 4.10%
Q3: 1.82%
TCOM: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Trip.com (TCOM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Restaurant Brands (QSR) reports a payout of 56.48%, ranking against industry peers normally.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

56.48%

Max: 89.80%
QSR: 56.48%
Q3: 36.83%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

0.00%

Max: 89.80%
Q3: 36.83%
TCOM: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM)
Metric	QSR	TCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.27%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	56.48%	0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Trip.com (TCOM) at 8.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 17.07 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for TCOM, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

17.07

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
Median: 21.88
QSR: 17.07
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

8.95

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
Median: 21.88
Q1: 13.00
TCOM: 8.95
Min: 5.72

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Trip.com (TCOM) at 0.43 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 3.64 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

3.64

Max: 6.40
QSR: 3.64
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

0.43

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
Q1: 0.74
TCOM: 0.43
Min: 0.08

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Trip.com (TCOM) at 1.18 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 6.87 carries an above-peer premium to book — QSR is pricier on assets.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

6.87

Max: 12.02
QSR: 6.87
Q3: 5.58
Median: 2.37
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

TCOM

Consumer Services industry group

1.18

Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
Median: 2.37
TCOM: 1.18
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Trip.com (TCOM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Trip.com (TCOM)
Metric	QSR	TCOM
P/E Ratio (TTM)	17.07	8.95
P/S Ratio (TTM)	3.64	0.43
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	6.87	1.18
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.48%	--