Seek Returns logo

QCOM vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at QCOM and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

QCOM is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolQCOMSONY
Company NameQUALCOMM IncorporatedSony Group Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization182.57 billion USD175.85 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 13, 1991February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of QCOM and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

QCOM vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolQCOMSONY
5-Day Price Return-4.14%3.35%
13-Week Price Return4.46%15.95%
26-Week Price Return5.03%13.15%
52-Week Price Return-2.22%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return3.50%4.31%
Year-to-Date Return8.29%26.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.29M17.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.94M13.63M
3-Month Volatility25.70%32.88%
Beta1.271.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

QCOM

42.85%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s Return on Equity of 42.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

QCOM

26.77%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places QCOM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

SONY’s Net Profit Margin of 9.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

QCOM

27.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

QCOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 27.54% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolQCOMSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)42.85%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.96%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.77%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.54%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.68%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

QCOM

3.19

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

QCOM’s Current Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

QCOM

0.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

QCOM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

QCOM

38.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

QCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolQCOMSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.191.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.381.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.540.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.40104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

QCOM vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

QCOM vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

QCOM

2.13%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.13%, QCOM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SONY

0.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.46% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

QCOM

32.79%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QCOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.79% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolQCOMSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.13%0.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.79%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

QCOM

15.38

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s P/E Ratio of 15.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SONY

22.69

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 22.69 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

QCOM

4.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

QCOM’s P/S Ratio of 4.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY

2.07

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

QCOM

6.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

QCOM’s P/B Ratio of 6.35 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

QCOM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolQCOMSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.3822.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.122.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.352.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.3212.93