Seek Returns logo

QBTS vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at QBTS and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolQBTSUBER
Company NameD-Wave Quantum Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareGround Transportation
Market Capitalization5.15 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 11, 2020May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of QBTS and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

QBTS vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolQBTSUBER
5-Day Price Return-17.16%2.55%
13-Week Price Return14.52%1.37%
26-Week Price Return131.69%16.74%
52-Week Price Return1,525.30%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return-12.39%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return79.29%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume43.94M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume59.32M20.55M
3-Month Volatility107.52%29.59%
Beta1.401.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

QBTS

--

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

Return on Equity data for QBTS is currently unavailable.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

QBTS

-1,263.92%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

QBTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1,263.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

QBTS

-353.14%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

QBTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -353.14%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolQBTSUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)--62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)-82.90%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1,263.92%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-353.14%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.46%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

QBTS

20.73

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

QBTS’s Current Ratio of 20.73 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

QBTS

0.15

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

QBTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

QBTS

-46.22

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

QBTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.22. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolQBTSUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)20.731.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)20.440.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.150.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-46.22-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

QBTS vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

QBTS vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

QBTS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

QBTS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolQBTSUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

QBTS

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for QBTS is currently unavailable.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

QBTS

231.24

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

With a P/S Ratio of 231.24, QBTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

QBTS

10.68

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

QBTS’s P/B Ratio of 10.68 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

QBTS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolQBTSUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--15.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)231.244.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.688.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--22.90