Seek Returns

PWR vs. ZTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at PWR and ZTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPWRZTO
Company NameQuanta Services, Inc.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsTransportation
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAir Freight & Logistics
GICS Sub-IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization117.25 billion USD19.18 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 12, 1998October 27, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

PWR is a standard domestic listing, while ZTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

PWR’s market capitalization (117.25 billion USD) is substantially larger than ZTO’s (19.18 billion USD), indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ZTO is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. PWR, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PWR and ZTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PWR
ZTO
Loading price history…
PWR vs. ZTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPWRZTO
5-Day Price Return1.27%-0.15%
13-Week Price Return53.78%13.13%
26-Week Price Return73.32%31.28%
52-Week Price Return139.77%2.50%
Month-to-Date Return7.37%0.46%
Year-to-Date Return85.13%21.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.48M1.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.12M2.01M
3-Month Volatility46.60%31.52%
Beta1.260.29

PWR’s beta of 1.26 points to significantly higher volatility compared to ZTO (beta: 0.29), suggesting PWR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PWR

12.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
41.13%
Q3
23.06%
Median
16.70%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-7.11%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 12.91% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZTO

14.11%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
35.55%
Q3
32.78%
Median
15.76%
Q1
10.20%
Min
4.46%

ZTO’s Return on Equity of 14.11% is on par with the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

3.67%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
14.59%
Q3
8.56%
Median
3.98%
Q1
2.94%
Min
-2.99%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.67% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ZTO

18.49%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
7.32%
Q3
6.63%
Median
4.88%
Q1
3.22%
Min
0.98%

ZTO’s Net Profit Margin of 18.49% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

5.68%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
16.30%
Q3
10.50%
Median
6.88%
Q1
5.67%
Min
1.88%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.68% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZTO

21.24%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
9.51%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.37%
Min
2.52%

ZTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPWRZTO
Return on Equity (TTM)12.91%14.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.74%9.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.67%18.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.68%21.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)15.10%24.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

1.14

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
1.91
Q3
1.54
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.79

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZTO

1.49

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
1.53
Q3
1.51
Median
1.47
Q1
1.34
Min
1.21

ZTO’s Current Ratio of 1.49 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

0.65

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
2.11
Q3
1.21
Median
0.71
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZTO

0.17

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
1.55
Q3
0.95
Median
0.59
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

ZTO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 is typical for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PWR

7.98

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
20.38
Q3
14.33
Median
7.52
Q1
3.09
Min
-5.30

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZTO

--

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
18.49
Q3
13.77
Median
10.96
Q1
8.04
Min
1.78

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ZTO is currently unavailable.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPWRZTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.141.49
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.041.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.650.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.98--

Growth

Revenue Growth

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolPWRZTO
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)26.33%12.31%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)21.09%10.88%
3-Year Revenue CAGR18.60%11.54%
5-Year Revenue CAGR20.52%14.26%

EPS Growth

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolPWRZTO
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)51.81%16.24%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)17.81%5.47%
3-Year EPS CAGR26.99%10.05%
5-Year EPS CAGR17.25%15.35%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PWR

0.05%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
0.74%
Q3
0.37%
Median
0.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.05% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
1.50%
Q3
1.50%
Median
1.16%
Q1
0.51%
Min
0.00%

ZTO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PWR

5.62%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
21.07%
Q3
10.91%
Median
4.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.62% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
102.91%
Q3
52.66%
Median
30.31%
Q1
14.30%
Min
0.00%

ZTO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPWRZTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.05%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)5.62%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PWR

103.72

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
103.72
Q3
59.21
Median
40.74
Q1
27.09
Min
21.82

A P/E Ratio of 103.72 places PWR in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ZTO

14.03

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
44.29
Q3
29.69
Median
24.75
Q1
18.26
Min
14.03

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s P/E Ratio of 14.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PWR

3.80

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
3.80
Q3
3.14
Median
2.34
Q1
1.35
Min
0.41

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 3.80 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZTO

2.60

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
1.83
Q3
1.54
Median
0.98
Q1
0.83
Min
0.43

With a P/S Ratio of 2.60, ZTO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

9.11

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
11.56
Q3
8.28
Median
5.34
Q1
4.11
Min
1.27

PWR’s P/B Ratio of 9.11 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ZTO

1.68

Air Freight & Logistics Industry
Max
10.29
Q3
6.89
Median
3.06
Q1
1.84
Min
1.24

ZTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.68 is in the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PWR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPWRZTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)103.7214.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.802.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.111.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)72.5910.65