Seek Returns logo

PWR vs. WM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PWR and WM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPWRWM
Company NameQuanta Services, Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization60.19 billion USD92.31 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 12, 1998June 22, 1988
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PWR and WM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PWR vs. WM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPWRWM
5-Day Price Return-3.69%-0.22%
13-Week Price Return38.90%0.16%
26-Week Price Return13.43%9.42%
52-Week Price Return61.42%13.95%
Month-to-Date Return7.42%0.15%
Year-to-Date Return28.50%13.56%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.47M1.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.26M1.71M
3-Month Volatility29.11%17.44%
Beta0.05-0.18

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PWR

13.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.10% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WM

31.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, WM’s Return on Equity of 31.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

3.74%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WM

11.36%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.36% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

5.75%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.75% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WM

17.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.52% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPWRWM
Return on Equity (TTM)13.10%31.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.13%6.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.74%11.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.75%17.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)14.96%39.72%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

1.31

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WM

0.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

WM’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

0.59

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WM

2.61

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.61, WM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WM

6.82

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

WM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPWRWM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.310.86
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.180.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.592.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.766.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

PWR vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PWR vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PWR

0.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

WM

1.36%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Yield of 1.36% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PWR

6.01%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.01% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

WM

46.71%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.71% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPWRWM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.09%1.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.01%46.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PWR

66.40

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 66.40, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

WM

34.33

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

WM’s P/E Ratio of 34.33 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PWR

2.48

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.48 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WM

3.90

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

WM’s P/S Ratio of 3.90 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

5.05

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

PWR’s P/B Ratio of 5.05 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WM

10.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 10.01, WM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PWR vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPWRWM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)66.4034.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.483.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.0510.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.1643.18