Seek Returns logo

PWR vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PWR and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPWRUPS
Company NameQuanta Services, Inc.United Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization62.68 billion USD70.96 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 12, 1998November 10, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PWR and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PWR vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPWRUPS
5-Day Price Return5.05%-0.44%
13-Week Price Return12.99%-17.25%
26-Week Price Return65.04%-24.75%
52-Week Price Return41.09%-37.78%
Month-to-Date Return1.50%-4.47%
Year-to-Date Return33.10%-33.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.05M9.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.06M7.09M
3-Month Volatility25.26%30.00%
Beta1.151.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UPS

35.27%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.63%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.41%
Min
2.11%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UPS

6.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
5.98%
Median
4.11%
Q1
2.45%
Min
0.50%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.34% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UPS

9.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.19%
Median
5.82%
Q1
3.63%
Min
1.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.30% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPWRUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.09%35.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.08%8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.73%6.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.73%9.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)15.04%81.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UPS

1.32

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.33
Median
1.15
Q1
0.95
Min
0.61

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UPS

1.57

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.25
Median
0.77
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

UPS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UPS

9.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPWRUPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.371.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.241.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.601.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.769.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

PWR vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PWR vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PWR

0.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UPS

7.61%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.20%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.55%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Yield of 7.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UPS

94.15%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
60.17%
Q1
4.60%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.15% is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPWRUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.09%7.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)5.92%94.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PWR

62.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 62.54, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UPS

12.37

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
30.08
Q3
23.03
Median
18.40
Q1
12.84
Min
5.90

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s P/E Ratio of 12.37 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PWR

2.33

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.33 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UPS

0.78

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.40
Median
0.63
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.78 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.13 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UPS

5.43

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
5.68
Q3
3.23
Median
1.97
Q1
1.31
Min
0.80

UPS’s P/B Ratio of 5.43 is in the upper tier for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PWR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPWRUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)62.5412.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.330.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.135.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.7413.19