Seek Returns logo

PWR vs. RTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PWR and RTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PWR is a standard domestic listing, while RTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolPWRRTO
Company NameQuanta Services, Inc.Rentokil Initial plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization56.01 billion USD12.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 12, 1998November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PWR and RTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PWR vs. RTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPWRRTO
5-Day Price Return-0.43%-2.47%
13-Week Price Return9.04%3.18%
26-Week Price Return29.23%-12.52%
52-Week Price Return40.20%-24.83%
Month-to-Date Return-7.45%-4.27%
Year-to-Date Return18.93%-9.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.00M3.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.19M4.20M
3-Month Volatility22.91%31.78%
Beta1.060.93

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RTO

6.17%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

RTO’s Return on Equity of 6.17% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RTO

5.49%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

RTO’s Net Profit Margin of 5.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RTO

9.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

RTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.93% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPWRRTO
Return on Equity (TTM)13.09%6.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.08%2.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.73%5.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.73%9.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)15.04%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RTO

1.12

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RTO’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RTO

1.14

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RTO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RTO

5.22

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RTO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPWRRTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.371.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.241.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.601.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.765.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

PWR vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PWR vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RTO

3.44%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Yield of 3.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

RTO

93.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 93.97% is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPWRRTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.10%3.44%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)5.92%93.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RTO

27.30

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/E Ratio of 27.30 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RTO

1.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RTO

1.69

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.69 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PWR vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPWRRTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)57.1027.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.131.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.131.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.8513.32