PWR vs. RTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at PWR and RTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
PWR is a standard domestic listing, while RTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.
| Symbol | PWR | RTO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Quanta Services, Inc. | Rentokil Initial plc |
| Country | United States | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry | Construction & Engineering | Commercial Services & Supplies |
| Market Capitalization | 66.08 billion USD | 14.00 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 12, 1998 | November 18, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of PWR and RTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RTO |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 5.37% | 7.18% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 16.05% | 23.81% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 75.94% | 21.10% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 44.21% | 16.54% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 7.01% | 10.43% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 40.31% | 3.54% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 0.90M | 5.29M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.06M | 3.55M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 26.03% | 31.82% |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.05 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
PWR
13.09%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 26.79%
- Q3
- 16.47%
- Median
- 10.66%
- Q1
- 8.46%
- Min
- -1.86%
PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
RTO
6.15%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 31.93%
- Q3
- 16.86%
- Median
- 10.28%
- Q1
- 6.63%
- Min
- 0.71%
RTO’s Return on Equity of 6.15% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
PWR
3.73%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.67%
- Q3
- 6.13%
- Median
- 3.82%
- Q1
- 2.31%
- Min
- -2.77%
PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
RTO
5.57%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 16.98%
- Q3
- 9.05%
- Median
- 5.35%
- Q1
- 3.42%
- Min
- -2.31%
RTO’s Net Profit Margin of 5.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
PWR
5.73%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.78%
- Q3
- 9.61%
- Median
- 6.19%
- Q1
- 3.73%
- Min
- -1.78%
PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
RTO
10.09%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 23.33%
- Q3
- 12.51%
- Median
- 8.33%
- Q1
- 4.45%
- Min
- -2.90%
RTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.09% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RTO |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 13.09% | 6.15% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 5.08% | 2.37% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 3.73% | 5.57% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 5.73% | 10.09% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 15.04% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
PWR
1.37
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.17
- Q3
- 1.50
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.65
PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
RTO
1.12
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 3.73
- Q3
- 2.13
- Median
- 1.31
- Q1
- 0.91
- Min
- 0.59
RTO’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
PWR
0.60
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.37
- Q3
- 1.24
- Median
- 0.62
- Q1
- 0.31
- Min
- 0.00
PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
RTO
1.14
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 2.24
- Q3
- 1.14
- Median
- 0.76
- Q1
- 0.36
- Min
- 0.00
RTO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
PWR
10.76
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 36.37
- Q3
- 17.88
- Median
- 8.20
- Q1
- 4.98
- Min
- -6.49
PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
RTO
5.22
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 24.70
- Q3
- 13.44
- Median
- 9.06
- Q1
- 3.42
- Min
- -10.97
RTO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RTO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.37 | 1.12 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 1.03 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 10.76 | 5.22 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
PWR
0.09%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.80%
- Q3
- 3.33%
- Median
- 2.22%
- Q1
- 0.21%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
RTO
2.34%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 3.65%
- Q3
- 2.43%
- Median
- 1.58%
- Q1
- 0.74%
- Min
- 0.00%
RTO’s Dividend Yield of 2.34% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
PWR
5.92%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 139.17%
- Q3
- 74.39%
- Median
- 51.48%
- Q1
- 15.67%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.
RTO
95.51%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 137.88%
- Q3
- 73.07%
- Median
- 44.79%
- Q1
- 27.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
RTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 95.51% is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RTO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.09% | 2.34% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 5.92% | 95.51% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
PWR
64.14
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 41.00
- Q3
- 26.91
- Median
- 16.02
- Q1
- 13.49
- Min
- 1.65
At 64.14, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
RTO
40.76
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 57.87
- Q3
- 33.40
- Median
- 23.56
- Q1
- 15.28
- Min
- 6.56
A P/E Ratio of 40.76 places RTO in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
PWR
2.39
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.93
- Q3
- 1.65
- Median
- 0.71
- Q1
- 0.45
- Min
- 0.11
PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.39 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
RTO
2.27
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 4.84
- Q3
- 2.58
- Median
- 1.09
- Q1
- 0.62
- Min
- 0.06
RTO’s P/S Ratio of 2.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
PWR
7.13
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 7.96
- Q3
- 4.06
- Median
- 1.98
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.24
PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.13 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
RTO
2.27
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.97
- Median
- 2.44
- Q1
- 1.60
- Min
- 0.40
RTO’s P/B Ratio of 2.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RTO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 64.14 | 40.76 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.39 | 2.27 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 7.13 | 2.27 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 45.90 | 19.62 |