PWR vs. ROK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 28, 2025

Here’s a clear look at PWR and ROK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	PWR	ROK
Company Name	Quanta Services, Inc.	Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Electrical Equipment
Market Capitalization	56.85 billion USD	39.26 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 12, 1998	December 31, 1981
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PWR and ROK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PWR vs. ROK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	PWR	ROK
5-Day Price Return	0.89%	2.85%
13-Week Price Return	11.45%	11.53%
26-Week Price Return	41.65%	18.28%
52-Week Price Return	40.79%	30.25%
Month-to-Date Return	-6.05%	-0.71%
Year-to-Date Return	20.73%	22.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.90M	0.90M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.18M	0.95M
3-Month Volatility	21.99%	22.00%
Beta	1.04	1.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ROK

28.15%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 37.56%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 14.38%
Q1: 4.35%
Min: 0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, ROK’s Return on Equity of 28.15% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ROK

12.03%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 20.43%
Q3: 10.97%
Median: 6.07%
Q1: 3.16%
Min: 0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.03% places ROK in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ROK

13.99%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 26.20%
Q3: 14.31%
Median: 7.54%
Q1: 3.77%
Min: -5.64%

ROK’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.99% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	PWR	ROK
Return on Equity (TTM)	13.09%	28.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)	5.08%	8.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.73%	12.03%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	5.73%	13.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	15.04%	39.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROK

1.06

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.02
Q3: 1.99
Median: 1.41
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.80

ROK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ROK

1.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 1.44
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.56
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

ROK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electrical Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ROK

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 36.12
Q3: 19.29
Median: 9.38
Q1: 1.16
Min: -10.92

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ROK is currently unavailable.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	PWR	ROK
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.37	1.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.24	0.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.60	1.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	10.76	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

PWR vs. ROK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PWR vs. ROK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ROK

1.52%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 2.20%
Q3: 1.53%
Median: 1.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ROK’s Dividend Yield of 1.52% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ROK

60.38%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 119.44%
Q3: 51.87%
Median: 27.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ROK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.38% is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	PWR	ROK
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.10%	1.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	5.92%	60.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ROK

39.64

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 81.85
Q3: 44.17
Median: 27.61
Q1: 18.62
Min: 7.73

ROK’s P/E Ratio of 39.64 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ROK

4.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.18
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.84
Q1: 0.97
Min: 0.44

ROK’s P/S Ratio of 4.77 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ROK

10.81

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.50
Q3: 4.53
Median: 3.39
Q1: 1.70
Min: 0.51

At 10.81, ROK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PWR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	PWR	ROK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	57.10	39.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.13	4.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	7.13	10.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	40.85	29.13