PWR vs. RKLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at PWR and RKLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | PWR | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Quanta Services, Inc. | Rocket Lab Corporation |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry | Construction & Engineering | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 64.57 billion USD | 23.22 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqCM |
| Listing Date | February 12, 1998 | November 24, 2020 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of PWR and RKLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -4.68% | -12.25% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 12.73% | 2.87% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 24.95% | 108.61% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 31.33% | 141.85% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -4.42% | -27.69% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 35.83% | 78.80% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 0.91M | 21.03M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.05M | 22.41M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 32.01% | 80.67% |
| Beta | 1.16 | 2.28 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
PWR
13.12%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 26.79%
- Q3
- 16.47%
- Median
- 10.66%
- Q1
- 8.46%
- Min
- -1.86%
PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.12% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
RKLB
-28.40%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 37.11%
- Q3
- 20.14%
- Median
- 11.72%
- Q1
- 6.30%
- Min
- -6.24%
RKLB has a negative Return on Equity of -28.40%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
PWR
3.74%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.67%
- Q3
- 6.13%
- Median
- 3.82%
- Q1
- 2.31%
- Min
- -2.77%
PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
RKLB
-35.64%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 13.66%
- Q3
- 8.61%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- 4.92%
- Min
- 1.01%
RKLB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
PWR
5.81%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.78%
- Q3
- 9.61%
- Median
- 6.19%
- Q1
- 3.73%
- Min
- -1.78%
PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.81% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
RKLB
-41.36%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 22.35%
- Q3
- 12.83%
- Median
- 9.29%
- Q1
- 6.38%
- Min
- -2.15%
RKLB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -41.36%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 13.12% | -28.40% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 5.06% | -12.72% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 3.74% | -35.64% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 5.81% | -41.36% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 15.16% | 31.70% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
PWR
1.34
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.17
- Q3
- 1.50
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.65
PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
RKLB
3.18
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 3.35
- Q3
- 2.03
- Median
- 1.24
- Q1
- 1.04
- Min
- 0.77
RKLB’s Current Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
PWR
0.67
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.37
- Q3
- 1.24
- Median
- 0.62
- Q1
- 0.31
- Min
- 0.00
PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
RKLB
0.34
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 1.72
- Q3
- 0.96
- Median
- 0.63
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.03
Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, RKLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
PWR
10.76
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 36.37
- Q3
- 17.88
- Median
- 8.20
- Q1
- 4.98
- Min
- -6.49
PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
RKLB
-45.87
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 36.57
- Q3
- 19.08
- Median
- 7.25
- Q1
- 2.65
- Min
- -7.63
RKLB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -45.87. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.34 | 3.18 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.23 | 2.69 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.67 | 0.34 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 10.76 | -45.87 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
PWR
0.09%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.80%
- Q3
- 3.33%
- Median
- 2.22%
- Q1
- 0.21%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
RKLB
0.00%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 2.72%
- Q3
- 1.45%
- Median
- 0.48%
- Q1
- 0.08%
- Min
- 0.00%
RKLB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
PWR
5.78%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 139.17%
- Q3
- 74.39%
- Median
- 51.48%
- Q1
- 15.67%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.78% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.
RKLB
0.00%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 110.40%
- Q3
- 50.43%
- Median
- 17.11%
- Q1
- 0.46%
- Min
- 0.00%
RKLB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.09% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 5.78% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
PWR
62.88
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 41.00
- Q3
- 26.91
- Median
- 16.02
- Q1
- 13.49
- Min
- 1.65
At 62.88, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
RKLB
--
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 67.20
- Q3
- 55.74
- Median
- 33.28
- Q1
- 27.49
- Min
- 15.02
P/E Ratio data for RKLB is currently unavailable.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
PWR
2.35
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.93
- Q3
- 1.65
- Median
- 0.71
- Q1
- 0.45
- Min
- 0.11
PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.35 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
RKLB
41.72
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 9.06
- Q3
- 4.87
- Median
- 2.47
- Q1
- 1.61
- Min
- 0.33
With a P/S Ratio of 41.72, RKLB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
PWR
7.36
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 7.96
- Q3
- 4.06
- Median
- 1.98
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.24
PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.36 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
RKLB
18.10
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 14.90
- Q3
- 8.93
- Median
- 4.70
- Q1
- 3.03
- Min
- 0.83
At 18.10, RKLB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | PWR | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 62.88 | -- |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.35 | 41.72 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 7.36 | 18.10 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 51.14 | -- |