PUK vs. V: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 3, 2025

Here’s a clear look at PUK and V, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PUK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, V is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	PUK	V
Company Name	Prudential plc	Visa Inc.
Country	Hong Kong	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Insurance	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	35.82 billion USD	654.82 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 29, 2000	March 19, 2008
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PUK and V by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PUK vs. V: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	PUK	V
5-Day Price Return	1.17%	0.80%
13-Week Price Return	14.96%	-3.85%
26-Week Price Return	24.79%	-0.81%
52-Week Price Return	48.18%	24.06%
Month-to-Date Return	0.10%	-2.96%
Year-to-Date Return	63.58%	8.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.30M	7.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.55M	6.38M
3-Month Volatility	19.44%	16.67%
Beta	1.41	0.89

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PUK

13.58%

Insurance Industry

Max: 30.96%
Q3: 18.76%
Median: 14.22%
Q1: 10.34%
Min: 1.73%

PUK’s Return on Equity of 13.58% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

V

52.65%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

V’s Return on Equity of 52.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PUK

19.26%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.69%
Median: 9.87%
Q1: 6.59%
Min: -3.51%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.26% places PUK in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

V

52.16%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

A Net Profit Margin of 52.16% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PUK

20.87%

Insurance Industry

Max: 34.52%
Q3: 20.17%
Median: 14.46%
Q1: 9.62%
Min: -2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

V

62.21%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

An Operating Profit Margin of 62.21% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	PUK	V
Return on Equity (TTM)	13.58%	52.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.28%	21.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	19.26%	52.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	20.87%	62.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	80.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PUK

0.36

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.37
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

V

1.12

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PUK

0.27

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

V

0.65

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PUK

8.97

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 21.45
Median: 9.67
Q1: 3.55
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

V

24.71

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	PUK	V
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.36	1.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.36	1.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.27	0.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	8.97	24.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

PUK vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PUK vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PUK

1.54%

Insurance Industry

Max: 9.80%
Q3: 5.18%
Median: 3.58%
Q1: 2.07%
Min: 0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Yield of 1.54% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

V

0.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PUK

24.16%

Insurance Industry

Max: 169.40%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 53.26%
Q1: 23.68%
Min: 0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.16% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

V

22.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.33% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	PUK	V
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.54%	0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	24.16%	22.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PUK

15.64

Insurance Industry

Max: 30.75
Q3: 18.11
Median: 12.67
Q1: 9.66
Min: 2.87

PUK’s P/E Ratio of 15.64 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

V

32.84

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

A P/E Ratio of 32.84 places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PUK

3.01

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.88
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.80
Min: 0.23

PUK’s P/S Ratio of 3.01 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

V

17.13

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PUK

1.30

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.57
Q3: 2.56
Median: 1.88
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.17

PUK’s P/B Ratio of 1.30 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

V

17.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

At 17.81, V’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PUK vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	PUK	V
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	15.64	32.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.01	17.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.30	17.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	10.19	30.17