Seek Returns logo

PSO vs. VOD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PSO and VOD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both PSO and VOD are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolPSOVOD
Company NamePearson plcVodafone Group Public Limited Company
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryDiversified Consumer ServicesWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization9.10 billion USD27.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 18, 1996November 2, 1988
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PSO and VOD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PSO vs. VOD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPSOVOD
5-Day Price Return-0.33%-0.45%
13-Week Price Return-1.08%5.09%
26-Week Price Return-13.42%18.48%
52-Week Price Return2.53%13.37%
Month-to-Date Return-0.43%-1.76%
Year-to-Date Return-17.94%23.92%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.16M37.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.39M47.50M
3-Month Volatility19.56%16.15%
Beta0.411.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PSO

11.56%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.84%
Q3
21.21%
Median
13.32%
Q1
11.02%
Min
0.11%

PSO’s Return on Equity of 11.56% is on par with the norm for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VOD

-7.42%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.45%
Q3
19.26%
Median
13.73%
Q1
9.72%
Min
-1.57%

VOD has a negative Return on Equity of -7.42%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PSO

12.53%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
20.09%
Q3
13.26%
Median
12.53%
Q1
7.59%
Min
0.13%

PSO’s Net Profit Margin of 12.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VOD

-10.83%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
23.76%
Q3
13.90%
Median
10.68%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-1.18%

VOD has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.83%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PSO

15.97%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.98%
Q3
22.01%
Median
15.97%
Q1
9.54%
Min
0.80%

PSO’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.97% is around the midpoint for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VOD

-0.15%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.15%
Q1
16.37%
Min
8.96%

VOD has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.15%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPSOVOD
Return on Equity (TTM)11.56%-7.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.72%-3.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.53%-10.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.97%-0.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.45%33.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PSO

2.31

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
2.31
Median
1.58
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

PSO’s Current Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the median group of the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VOD

1.26

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
0.98
Median
0.71
Q1
0.56
Min
0.37

VOD’s Current Ratio of 1.26 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PSO

0.41

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.64
Median
0.19
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

PSO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 is typical for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VOD

1.01

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.80
Q3
2.17
Median
1.52
Q1
0.93
Min
0.48

VOD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PSO

13.44

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
54.22
Q3
32.36
Median
10.70
Q1
4.19
Min
1.66

PSO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VOD

-0.02

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.47
Median
3.79
Q1
1.76
Min
-0.02

VOD has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPSOVOD
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.311.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.241.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.411.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.44-0.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

PSO vs. VOD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PSO vs. VOD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PSO

2.37%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.95%
Q3
1.55%
Median
0.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.37%, PSO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VOD

7.67%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
8.69%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.79%
Q1
2.67%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.67%, VOD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PSO

36.05%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
52.37%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.05% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VOD

94.94%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
169.59%
Q3
122.96%
Median
73.67%
Q1
63.98%
Min
1.50%

VOD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.94% is within the typical range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPSOVOD
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.37%7.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.05%94.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PSO

15.24

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
38.85
Q3
31.29
Median
22.33
Q1
15.56
Min
7.57

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, PSO’s P/E Ratio of 15.24 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VOD

--

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
31.43
Q3
21.97
Median
16.89
Q1
12.46
Min
7.52

P/E Ratio data for VOD is currently unavailable.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PSO

1.91

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.78
Min
1.07

PSO’s P/S Ratio of 1.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VOD

0.62

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.65
Q3
2.21
Median
1.32
Q1
1.17
Min
0.62

VOD’s P/S Ratio of 0.62 falls below the typical floor for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This could suggest the stock is overlooked or deeply undervalued relative to its sales, but may also reflect significant market concerns about its future.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PSO

1.95

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.43
Q3
5.06
Median
3.19
Q1
1.95
Min
0.95

PSO’s P/B Ratio of 1.95 is within the conventional range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VOD

0.40

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.86
Median
2.07
Q1
1.40
Min
0.40

VOD’s P/B Ratio of 0.40 is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PSO vs. VOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPSOVOD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.24--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.910.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.950.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.912.69