PSA vs. REG: Public Storage vs. Regency Centers Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Public Storage (PSA) and Regency Centers (REG) both fall under the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group, but PSA is classified in Specialized REITs while REG is classified in Retail REITs.

Both Public Storage (PSA) and Regency Centers (REG) are REITs — read their payout ratios and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than at face value.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Public Storage (PSA) at 15.60% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Regency Centers (REG) at 7.67% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PSA.

Neither Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) is well served by net margin: heavy depreciation makes net income a poor profitability proxy in their businesses, where FFO-based measures are the standard read.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Public Storage (PSA) at 2.74% and Regency Centers (REG) at 6.85% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

EPS growth isn't a meaningful figure for either Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under our convention.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Regency Centers (REG) at 1.03 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Public Storage (PSA) at 0.37 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PSA.

Both Public Storage (PSA) at 0.80 and Regency Centers (REG) at 0.72 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Public Storage (PSA) at 3.52% and Regency Centers (REG) at 3.96% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

An earnings-based payout ratio fits neither Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): their distributions are mandated and conventionally measured against FFO, so the accounting-earnings ratio overstates both.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

P/E ratio is not a meaningful valuation yardstick for either Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): depreciation suppresses reported earnings in their businesses, and price-to-FFO is the conventional yardstick instead.

Both Public Storage (PSA) at 12.50 and Regency Centers (REG) at 8.15 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

Regency Centers (REG) at 2.08 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Public Storage (PSA) at 6.45 prices above its benchmark range — PSA looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics