PRU vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 26, 2025

Here’s a clear look at PRU and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	PRU	RKT
Company Name	Prudential Financial, Inc.	Rocket Companies, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Insurance	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	37.70 billion USD	37.49 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 13, 2001	August 6, 2020
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PRU and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PRU vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	PRU	RKT
5-Day Price Return	0.29%	-5.13%
13-Week Price Return	-0.79%	37.14%
26-Week Price Return	-4.27%	38.10%
52-Week Price Return	-7.46%	-7.45%
Month-to-Date Return	3.43%	20.24%
Year-to-Date Return	-9.62%	57.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.63M	16.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.67M	15.96M
3-Month Volatility	22.10%	58.40%
Beta	1.05	2.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PRU

5.49%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

PRU’s Return on Equity of 5.49% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PRU

2.96%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, PRU’s Net Profit Margin of 2.96% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PRU

3.74%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	PRU	RKT
Return on Equity (TTM)	5.49%	-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.22%	0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.96%	-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	3.74%	13.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PRU

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PRU

0.71

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PRU

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	PRU	RKT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.71	2.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	2.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

PRU vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PRU vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PRU

5.07%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.07%, PRU offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PRU

85.37%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

PRU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.37% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	PRU	RKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	5.07%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	85.37%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PRU

23.06

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

A P/E Ratio of 23.06 places PRU in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RKT

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PRU

0.68

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

In the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, PRU’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RKT

7.31

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PRU

1.24

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

PRU’s P/B Ratio of 1.24 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PRU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	PRU	RKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	23.06	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.68	7.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.24	3.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	8.20	20.65