Seek Returns logo

POOL vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at POOL and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPOOLVRT
Company NamePool CorporationVertiv Holdings Co
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryDistributorsElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization11.86 billion USD49.38 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 13, 1995August 2, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of POOL and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

POOL vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPOOLVRT
5-Day Price Return2.99%2.16%
13-Week Price Return5.41%17.78%
26-Week Price Return-7.60%34.71%
52-Week Price Return-10.87%65.65%
Month-to-Date Return3.15%-11.19%
Year-to-Date Return-6.77%13.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.54M5.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.59M7.48M
3-Month Volatility30.89%40.17%
Beta1.121.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

POOL

31.34%

Distributors Industry

Max
18.85%
Q3
17.85%
Median
13.11%
Q1
11.23%
Min
11.19%

POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

POOL

7.79%

Distributors Industry

Max
5.04%
Q3
4.92%
Median
4.56%
Q1
4.55%
Min
4.54%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

POOL

11.13%

Distributors Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
7.80%
Median
5.53%
Q1
3.65%
Min
3.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.13% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPOOLVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)31.34%32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.64%8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.79%8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.13%13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.46%35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

POOL

2.52

Distributors Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.72
Median
1.48
Q1
1.24
Min
1.15

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

POOL

0.95

Distributors Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.98
Median
0.75
Q1
0.52
Min
0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max
13.15
Q3
10.84
Median
5.59
Q1
4.01
Min
3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPOOLVRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.521.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.821.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.950.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.282.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

POOL vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

POOL vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

POOL

1.52%

Distributors Industry

Max
44.83%
Q3
35.02%
Median
4.81%
Q1
3.26%
Min
1.54%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 1.52% is below the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

POOL

44.67%

Distributors Industry

Max
1,122.47%
Q3
858.23%
Median
55.08%
Q1
44.32%
Min
34.92%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.67% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPOOLVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.52%0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.67%6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

POOL

29.38

Distributors Industry

Max
28.99
Q3
25.04
Median
23.42
Q1
13.71
Min
6.24

At 29.38, POOL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VRT

59.82

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 59.82 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

POOL

2.29

Distributors Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.96
Q1
0.61
Min
0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 2.29, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRT

5.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

POOL

8.44

Distributors Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
3.57
Median
3.12
Q1
2.41
Min
1.47

At 8.44, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

POOL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Distributors and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPOOLVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.3859.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.295.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.4415.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.8739.11