Seek Returns logo

POOL vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at POOL and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPOOLUPS
Company NamePool CorporationUnited Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryDistributorsAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization11.75 billion USD73.69 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 13, 1995November 10, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of POOL and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

POOL vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPOOLUPS
5-Day Price Return-3.42%-1.82%
13-Week Price Return-2.33%-12.28%
26-Week Price Return-7.45%-24.82%
52-Week Price Return-8.87%-32.58%
Month-to-Date Return2.21%0.91%
Year-to-Date Return-7.62%-31.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.46M8.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.59M6.38M
3-Month Volatility30.35%31.06%
Beta1.121.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

POOL

31.34%

Distributors Industry

Max
18.85%
Q3
17.85%
Median
13.11%
Q1
11.23%
Min
11.19%

POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UPS

35.27%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

POOL

7.79%

Distributors Industry

Max
5.04%
Q3
4.92%
Median
4.56%
Q1
4.55%
Min
4.54%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UPS

6.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.34% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

POOL

11.13%

Distributors Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
7.80%
Median
5.53%
Q1
3.65%
Min
3.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.13% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UPS

9.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.30% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPOOLUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)31.34%35.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.64%8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.79%6.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.13%9.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.46%81.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

POOL

2.52

Distributors Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.72
Median
1.48
Q1
1.24
Min
1.15

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UPS

1.32

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

POOL

0.95

Distributors Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.98
Median
0.75
Q1
0.52
Min
0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UPS

1.57

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

UPS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max
13.15
Q3
10.84
Median
5.59
Q1
4.01
Min
3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UPS

9.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPOOLUPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.521.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.821.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.951.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.289.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

POOL vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

POOL vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

POOL

1.52%

Distributors Industry

Max
44.83%
Q3
35.02%
Median
4.81%
Q1
3.26%
Min
1.54%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 1.52% is below the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

UPS

7.29%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Yield of 7.29% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

POOL

44.67%

Distributors Industry

Max
1,122.47%
Q3
858.23%
Median
55.08%
Q1
44.32%
Min
34.92%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.67% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UPS

94.15%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.15% is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPOOLUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.52%7.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.67%94.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

POOL

29.38

Distributors Industry

Max
28.99
Q3
25.04
Median
23.42
Q1
13.71
Min
6.24

At 29.38, POOL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UPS

12.92

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s P/E Ratio of 12.92 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

POOL

2.29

Distributors Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.96
Q1
0.61
Min
0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 2.29, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UPS

0.82

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

POOL

8.44

Distributors Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
3.57
Median
3.12
Q1
2.41
Min
1.47

At 8.44, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UPS

5.43

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

At 5.43, UPS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

POOL vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Distributors and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPOOLUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.3812.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.290.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.445.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.8713.77