Seek Returns logo

POOL vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at POOL and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPOOLSTN
Company NamePool CorporationStantec Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryDistributorsConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization11.75 billion USD12.15 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 13, 1995August 5, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of POOL and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

POOL vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPOOLSTN
5-Day Price Return-3.42%-0.40%
13-Week Price Return-2.33%5.18%
26-Week Price Return-7.45%35.70%
52-Week Price Return-8.87%32.54%
Month-to-Date Return2.21%-1.66%
Year-to-Date Return-7.62%32.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.46M0.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.59M0.27M
3-Month Volatility30.35%15.63%
Beta1.120.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

POOL

31.34%

Distributors Industry

Max
18.85%
Q3
17.85%
Median
13.11%
Q1
11.23%
Min
11.19%

POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

POOL

7.79%

Distributors Industry

Max
5.04%
Q3
4.92%
Median
4.56%
Q1
4.55%
Min
4.54%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

POOL

11.13%

Distributors Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
7.80%
Median
5.53%
Q1
3.65%
Min
3.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.13% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPOOLSTN
Return on Equity (TTM)31.34%15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.64%6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.79%7.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.13%9.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.46%54.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

POOL

2.52

Distributors Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.72
Median
1.48
Q1
1.24
Min
1.15

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

POOL

0.95

Distributors Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.98
Median
0.75
Q1
0.52
Min
0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max
13.15
Q3
10.84
Median
5.59
Q1
4.01
Min
3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPOOLSTN
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.521.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.821.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.950.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.2860.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

POOL vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

POOL vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

POOL

1.52%

Distributors Industry

Max
44.83%
Q3
35.02%
Median
4.81%
Q1
3.26%
Min
1.54%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 1.52% is below the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

POOL

44.67%

Distributors Industry

Max
1,122.47%
Q3
858.23%
Median
55.08%
Q1
44.32%
Min
34.92%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.67% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPOOLSTN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.52%0.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.67%22.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

POOL

29.38

Distributors Industry

Max
28.99
Q3
25.04
Median
23.42
Q1
13.71
Min
6.24

At 29.38, POOL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

STN

38.90

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 38.90, STN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

POOL

2.29

Distributors Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.96
Q1
0.61
Min
0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 2.29, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

STN

2.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.76 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

POOL

8.44

Distributors Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
3.57
Median
3.12
Q1
2.41
Min
1.47

At 8.44, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

POOL vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPOOLSTN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.3838.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.292.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.444.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.8727.08