Seek Returns logo

PONY vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PONY and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, PWR is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolPONYPWR
Company NamePony AI Inc.Quanta Services, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization7.52 billion USD62.68 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 27, 2024February 12, 1998
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PONY and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PONY vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPONYPWR
5-Day Price Return3.83%5.05%
13-Week Price Return70.38%12.99%
26-Week Price Return103.90%65.04%
52-Week Price Return--41.09%
Month-to-Date Return56.51%1.50%
Year-to-Date Return56.72%33.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.60M1.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.88M1.06M
3-Month Volatility69.62%25.26%
Beta2.801.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PONY

-41.07%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

PONY has a negative Return on Equity of -41.07%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PONY

-521.79%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

PONY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -521.79%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PONY

-567.77%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

PONY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -567.77%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPONYPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)-41.07%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)-36.85%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-521.79%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-567.77%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)24.22%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PONY

6.19

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

PONY’s Current Ratio of 6.19 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PONY

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

PONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PONY

--

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

Interest Coverage Ratio data for PONY is currently unavailable.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPONYPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.191.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.671.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--10.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

PONY vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PONY vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PONY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PONY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PWR

0.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PONY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PONY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPONYPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PONY

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for PONY is currently unavailable.

PWR

62.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 62.54, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PONY

111.04

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

With a P/S Ratio of 111.04, PONY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PWR

2.33

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.33 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PONY

5.50

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

PONY’s P/B Ratio of 5.50 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.13 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PONY vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPONYPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--62.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)111.042.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.507.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--44.74