Seek Returns logo

PODD vs. TEVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PODD and TEVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PODD is a standard domestic listing, while TEVA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolPODDTEVA
Company NameInsulet CorporationTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization23.16 billion USD20.79 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 15, 2007February 16, 1982
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PODD and TEVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PODD vs. TEVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEVA
5-Day Price Return0.46%1.22%
13-Week Price Return2.49%4.64%
26-Week Price Return15.98%5.71%
52-Week Price Return77.21%-8.43%
Month-to-Date Return14.08%11.26%
Year-to-Date Return26.02%-23.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.60M1.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.77M2.23M
3-Month Volatility28.67%24.67%
Beta1.42-0.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PODD

18.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

PODD’s Return on Equity of 18.43% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEVA

-2.58%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

TEVA has a negative Return on Equity of -2.58%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PODD

10.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

PODD’s Net Profit Margin of 10.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEVA

-0.95%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

TEVA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.95%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PODD

12.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

PODD’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.01% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEVA

5.38%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

TEVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.38% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEVA
Return on Equity (TTM)18.43%-2.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.21%-0.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.01%-0.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.01%5.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.74%50.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PODD

2.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

PODD’s Current Ratio of 2.26 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TEVA

1.06

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

TEVA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PODD

0.96

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PODD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TEVA

2.52

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.52, TEVA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Pharmaceuticals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PODD

33.28

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

PODD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.28 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TEVA

-0.38

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

TEVA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.38. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.261.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.550.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.962.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)33.28-0.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

PODD vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PODD vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PODD

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PODD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

TEVA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PODD

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PODD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

TEVA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PODD

98.83

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

At 98.83, PODD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TEVA

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for TEVA is currently unavailable.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PODD

9.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 9.89, PODD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TEVA

1.25

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TEVA’s P/S Ratio of 1.25 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PODD

15.11

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

At 15.11, PODD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TEVA

2.80

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

TEVA’s P/B Ratio of 2.80 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PODD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)98.83--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.891.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.112.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)61.0218.48