Seek Returns logo

PODD vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PODD and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPODDTEM
Company NameInsulet CorporationTempus AI, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization23.44 billion USD12.73 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 15, 2007June 14, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PODD and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PODD vs. TEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEM
5-Day Price Return5.45%2.36%
13-Week Price Return2.20%14.97%
26-Week Price Return18.03%-12.50%
52-Week Price Return69.97%27.20%
Month-to-Date Return15.46%29.49%
Year-to-Date Return27.55%117.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.81M15.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.77M12.07M
3-Month Volatility28.51%79.77%
Beta1.423.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PODD

18.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

PODD’s Return on Equity of 18.43% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PODD

10.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

PODD’s Net Profit Margin of 10.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PODD

12.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

PODD’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.01% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEM
Return on Equity (TTM)18.43%-107.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.21%-15.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.01%-20.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.01%-24.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.74%60.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PODD

2.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

PODD’s Current Ratio of 2.26 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PODD

0.96

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PODD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PODD

33.28

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

PODD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.28 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.261.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.551.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.962.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)33.28-14.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

PODD vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PODD vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PODD

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PODD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PODD

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PODD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PODD

98.83

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

At 98.83, PODD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PODD

9.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 9.89, PODD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TEM

13.37

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

With a P/S Ratio of 13.37, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PODD

15.11

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

At 15.11, PODD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PODD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPODDTEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)98.83--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.8913.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.1135.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)61.02--