Seek Returns logo

PM vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PM and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PM is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolPMUL
Company NamePhilip Morris International Inc.Unilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryTobaccoPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization269.06 billion USD155.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 2008March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PM and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PM vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPMUL
5-Day Price Return4.59%3.92%
13-Week Price Return-0.18%-0.93%
26-Week Price Return15.87%6.66%
52-Week Price Return45.93%-2.07%
Month-to-Date Return5.36%6.44%
Year-to-Date Return43.62%3.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.34M2.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.80M2.43M
3-Month Volatility25.38%15.01%
Beta0.500.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PM

575.44%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
7.92%
Q1
5.28%
Min
4.04%

PM’s Return on Equity of 575.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PM

21.08%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.05%
Q1
6.80%
Min
5.37%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.08% places PM in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PM

36.28%

Tobacco Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
12.68%
Median
11.00%
Q1
10.58%
Min
10.58%

PM’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPMUL
Return on Equity (TTM)575.44%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.56%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.08%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.28%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)66.46%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PM

0.83

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.20
Q3
1.83
Median
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.57

PM’s Current Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the median group of the Tobacco industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PM

186.08

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.74
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 186.08, PM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PM

11.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
36.48
Q3
28.54
Median
7.02
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

PM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Tobacco industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPMUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.830.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.830.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)186.081.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.6722.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

PM vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PM vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PM

3.10%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
6.06%
Median
5.48%
Q1
3.91%
Min
3.27%

PM’s Dividend Yield of 3.10% is below the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

UL

3.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.42%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PM

70.92%

Tobacco Industry

Max
77.64%
Q3
76.55%
Median
50.14%
Q1
47.08%
Min
42.39%

PM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.92% is within the typical range for the Tobacco industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPMUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.10%3.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)70.92%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PM

32.70

Tobacco Industry

Max
42.16
Q3
36.45
Median
20.93
Q1
10.52
Min
9.15

PM’s P/E Ratio of 32.70 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UL

23.23

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

UL’s P/E Ratio of 23.23 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PM

6.89

Tobacco Industry

Max
10.48
Q3
5.39
Median
3.32
Q1
1.54
Min
0.59

PM’s P/S Ratio of 6.89 is in the upper echelon for the Tobacco industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UL

2.16

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PM

1,368.86

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
2.18
Q1
1.70
Min
1.06

At 1,368.86, PM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UL

7.06

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PM vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPMUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.7023.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.892.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,368.867.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.6320.05