Seek Returns logo

PM vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PM and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPMTSLA
Company NamePhilip Morris International Inc.Tesla, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTobaccoAutomobiles
Market Capitalization269.06 billion USD1,044.72 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 2008June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PM and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PM vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPMTSLA
5-Day Price Return4.59%-3.48%
13-Week Price Return-0.18%-5.32%
26-Week Price Return15.87%-9.00%
52-Week Price Return45.93%45.43%
Month-to-Date Return5.36%5.07%
Year-to-Date Return43.62%-19.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.34M77.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.80M104.32M
3-Month Volatility25.38%55.64%
Beta0.502.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PM

575.44%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
7.92%
Q1
5.28%
Min
4.04%

PM’s Return on Equity of 575.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PM

21.08%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.05%
Q1
6.80%
Min
5.37%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.08% places PM in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PM

36.28%

Tobacco Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
12.68%
Median
11.00%
Q1
10.58%
Min
10.58%

PM’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPMTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)575.44%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.56%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.08%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.28%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)66.46%17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PM

0.83

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.20
Q3
1.83
Median
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.57

PM’s Current Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the median group of the Tobacco industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PM

186.08

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.74
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 186.08, PM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PM

11.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
36.48
Q3
28.54
Median
7.02
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

PM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Tobacco industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPMTSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.832.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.831.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)186.080.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.6771.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

PM vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PM vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PM

3.10%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
6.06%
Median
5.48%
Q1
3.91%
Min
3.27%

PM’s Dividend Yield of 3.10% is below the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PM

70.92%

Tobacco Industry

Max
77.64%
Q3
76.55%
Median
50.14%
Q1
47.08%
Min
42.39%

PM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.92% is within the typical range for the Tobacco industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPMTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.10%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)70.92%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PM

32.70

Tobacco Industry

Max
42.16
Q3
36.45
Median
20.93
Q1
10.52
Min
9.15

PM’s P/E Ratio of 32.70 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TSLA

172.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 172.34, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PM

6.89

Tobacco Industry

Max
10.48
Q3
5.39
Median
3.32
Q1
1.54
Min
0.59

PM’s P/S Ratio of 6.89 is in the upper echelon for the Tobacco industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TSLA

11.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.27, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PM

1,368.86

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
2.18
Q1
1.70
Min
1.06

At 1,368.86, PM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPMTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.70172.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.8911.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,368.8613.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.63187.03