Seek Returns logo

PKG vs. YUMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PKG and YUMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPKGYUMC
Company NamePackaging Corporation of AmericaYum China Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization19.19 billion USD15.39 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 28, 2000October 17, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PKG and YUMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PKG vs. YUMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPKGYUMC
5-Day Price Return-1.09%-0.96%
13-Week Price Return4.51%-10.19%
26-Week Price Return12.75%-19.46%
52-Week Price Return-0.03%-15.36%
Month-to-Date Return-2.13%-1.23%
Year-to-Date Return-5.26%-12.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.54M1.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.71M1.88M
3-Month Volatility22.53%25.50%
Beta0.940.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PKG

20.33%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Return on Equity of 20.33% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

YUMC

15.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

YUMC’s Return on Equity of 15.77% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

YUMC

8.04%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

YUMC’s Net Profit Margin of 8.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

YUMC

10.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

YUMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.71% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPKGYUMC
Return on Equity (TTM)20.33%15.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.16%8.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.47%8.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.39%10.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.13%41.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

3.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

YUMC

1.39

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

YUMC’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

0.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

YUMC

0.01

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, YUMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

YUMC

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

Interest Coverage Ratio data for YUMC is currently unavailable.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPKGYUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.541.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.211.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.540.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)26.71--

Growth

Revenue Growth

PKG vs. YUMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PKG vs. YUMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PKG

2.37%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.37% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

YUMC

1.90%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUMC’s Dividend Yield of 1.90% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PKG

49.67%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.67% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

YUMC

32.86%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.86% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPKGYUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.37%1.90%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)49.67%32.86%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PKG

20.95

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

A P/E Ratio of 20.95 places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

YUMC

17.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

YUMC’s P/E Ratio of 17.33 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PKG

2.19

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 2.19, PKG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Containers & Packaging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

YUMC

1.39

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

YUMC’s P/S Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

3.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

YUMC

2.88

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

YUMC’s P/B Ratio of 2.88 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PKG vs. YUMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPKGYUMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.9517.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.191.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.662.88
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.4018.76