PKG vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at PKG and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PKG is a standard domestic listing, while XPEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	PKG	XPEV
Company Name	Packaging Corporation of America	XPeng Inc.
Country	United States	China
GICS Sector	Materials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Automobiles
Market Capitalization	17.75 billion USD	19.91 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 28, 2000	August 27, 2020
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PKG and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PKG vs. XPEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	XPEV
5-Day Price Return	-2.81%	-19.67%
13-Week Price Return	-8.88%	-11.69%
26-Week Price Return	-1.42%	0.55%
52-Week Price Return	-19.57%	60.46%
Month-to-Date Return	-2.08%	-14.47%
Year-to-Date Return	-14.86%	69.97%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.76M	26.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.75M	10.36M
3-Month Volatility	24.40%	70.25%
Beta	0.91	1.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PKG

19.54%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 33.32%
Q3: 19.47%
Median: 12.36%
Q1: 6.76%
Min: -12.20%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Return on Equity of 19.54% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

XPEV

-9.33%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 28.52%
Q3: 12.92%
Median: 5.04%
Q1: -1.15%
Min: -15.36%

XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -9.33%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

10.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 11.45%
Q3: 8.67%
Median: 5.36%
Q1: 3.40%
Min: -2.25%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.18% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

XPEV

-4.04%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.74%
Q3: 5.64%
Median: 2.77%
Q1: -0.52%
Min: -6.61%

XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.04%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

14.14%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 12.87%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: 6.39%
Min: -0.41%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

XPEV

-6.07%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 7.22%
Median: 4.62%
Q1: -0.45%
Min: -6.16%

XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -6.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	XPEV
Return on Equity (TTM)	19.54%	-9.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)	9.45%	-3.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	10.18%	-4.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	14.14%	-6.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	21.79%	17.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

3.16

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.11
Q3: 1.55
Median: 1.33
Q1: 1.14
Min: 0.87

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

XPEV

1.12

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.58
Median: 1.28
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.47

XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

0.84

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 3.86
Q3: 1.96
Median: 1.25
Q1: 0.67
Min: 0.23

PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.84 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XPEV

1.00

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.00
Q3: 1.15
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.05

XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.00 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.38
Q1: 2.83
Min: 1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

XPEV

-19.30

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 35.88
Median: 13.88
Q1: 3.52
Min: -19.31

XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.30. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	XPEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.16	1.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.93	0.87
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.84	1.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	26.71	-19.30

Growth

Revenue Growth

PKG vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PKG vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PKG

2.61%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.42%
Q3: 5.04%
Median: 3.96%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: 0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.61% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.18%
Q3: 4.88%
Median: 2.84%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PKG

50.31%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 222.75%
Q3: 132.16%
Median: 63.96%
Q1: 27.01%
Min: 0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.31% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 114.43%
Q3: 60.59%
Median: 39.48%
Q1: 20.22%
Min: 0.00%

XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	XPEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.61%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	50.31%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PKG

19.31

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 19.86
Q3: 18.86
Median: 16.72
Q1: 13.58
Min: 6.36

A P/E Ratio of 19.31 places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

XPEV

Automobiles Industry

Max: 31.96
Q3: 22.07
Median: 11.17
Q1: 8.41
Min: 5.02

P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PKG

1.97

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.02
Q3: 1.14
Median: 0.89
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.31

PKG’s P/S Ratio of 1.97 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XPEV

2.25

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.29
Q3: 0.84
Median: 0.51
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.25, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

4.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.85
Median: 2.17
Q1: 1.46
Min: 0.76

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 4.12 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

XPEV

5.42

Automobiles Industry

Max: 3.99
Q3: 1.96
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.18

At 5.42, XPEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PKG vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	XPEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	19.31	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.97	2.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.12	5.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	23.85	15.52