PKG vs. SN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at PKG and SN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	PKG	SN
Company Name	Packaging Corporation of America	SharkNinja, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Household Durables
Market Capitalization	19.10 billion USD	16.34 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 28, 2000	July 31, 2023
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PKG and SN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PKG vs. SN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	SN
5-Day Price Return	7.05%	-2.97%
13-Week Price Return	10.23%	21.42%
26-Week Price Return	-0.04%	3.25%
52-Week Price Return	5.17%	28.45%
Month-to-Date Return	9.54%	-0.26%
Year-to-Date Return	-5.73%	18.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.86M	1.65M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.77M	1.64M
3-Month Volatility	25.82%	36.04%
Beta	0.95	1.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PKG

20.33%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 41.66%
Q3: 20.76%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 6.55%
Min: 3.64%

PKG’s Return on Equity of 20.33% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SN

26.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, SN’s Return on Equity of 26.00% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 11.61%
Q3: 8.17%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 4.20%
Min: 0.08%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SN

8.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

SN’s Net Profit Margin of 8.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.17%
Median: 8.87%
Q1: 6.86%
Min: 0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SN

11.88%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

SN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.88% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	SN
Return on Equity (TTM)	20.33%	26.00%
Return on Assets (TTM)	10.16%	11.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	10.47%	8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	14.39%	11.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	22.13%	48.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

3.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.57
Median: 1.27
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.58

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SN

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

SN’s Current Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

0.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.50
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SN

0.34

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

SN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.61
Q1: 2.94
Min: 1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SN

9.98

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

SN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	SN
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.54	1.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.21	1.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.54	0.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	26.71	9.98

Growth

Revenue Growth

PKG vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PKG vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PKG

2.53%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.37%
Q3: 4.07%
Median: 3.33%
Q1: 1.72%
Min: 0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

SN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PKG

49.67%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 221.20%
Q3: 119.52%
Median: 58.05%
Q1: 28.91%
Min: 0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.67% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

SN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	SN
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.53%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	49.67%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PKG

19.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 35.98
Q3: 27.87
Median: 16.15
Q1: 14.38
Min: 8.20

PKG’s P/E Ratio of 19.67 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SN

32.37

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

At 32.37, SN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Household Durables industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PKG

2.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.91
Q3: 1.67
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.64
Min: 0.30

PKG’s P/S Ratio of 2.06 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SN

2.85

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.85, SN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

3.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 5.28
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.57
Min: 0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SN

6.32

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

At 6.32, SN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PKG vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	PKG	SN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	19.67	32.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.06	2.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.66	6.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	28.54	36.62