Seek Returns logo

PKG vs. ROL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PKG and ROL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPKGROL
Company NamePackaging Corporation of AmericaRollins, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization17.64 billion USD28.16 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 28, 2000March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PKG and ROL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PKG vs. ROL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPKGROL
5-Day Price Return-1.74%-0.58%
13-Week Price Return1.96%1.55%
26-Week Price Return4.47%6.14%
52-Week Price Return-17.25%13.51%
Month-to-Date Return0.75%1.06%
Year-to-Date Return-12.40%25.61%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.81M4.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.74M1.96M
3-Month Volatility24.71%24.79%
Beta0.920.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PKG

19.54%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
33.32%
Q3
19.47%
Median
12.36%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-12.20%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Return on Equity of 19.54% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ROL

36.45%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.86%
Q3
17.95%
Median
10.20%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.69%

ROL’s Return on Equity of 36.45% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

10.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
8.67%
Median
5.36%
Q1
3.40%
Min
-2.25%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.18% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ROL

14.02%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.54%
Q3
10.35%
Median
5.85%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.02% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

14.14%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
12.87%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.39%
Min
-0.41%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ROL

19.47%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
25.57%
Q3
15.63%
Median
8.06%
Q1
4.76%
Min
-7.48%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.47% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPKGROL
Return on Equity (TTM)19.54%36.45%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.45%16.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.18%14.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.14%19.47%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.79%52.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

3.16

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.55
Median
1.33
Q1
1.14
Min
0.87

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ROL

0.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.94
Q3
2.24
Median
1.28
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

ROL’s Current Ratio of 0.77 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

0.84

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
3.86
Q3
1.96
Median
1.25
Q1
0.67
Min
0.23

PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.84 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ROL

0.32

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.11
Median
0.73
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

ROL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ROL

23.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
24.47
Median
9.83
Q1
3.74
Min
-10.97

ROL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.77 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPKGROL
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.160.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.930.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.840.32
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)26.7123.77

Growth

Revenue Growth

PKG vs. ROL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PKG vs. ROL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PKG

2.53%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.42%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ROL

1.13%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.89%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Yield of 1.13% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PKG

50.31%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
63.96%
Q1
27.01%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.31% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ROL

61.92%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
50.54%
Q1
29.39%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.92% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPKGROL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.53%1.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.31%61.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PKG

19.86

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
19.86
Q3
18.86
Median
16.72
Q1
13.58
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 19.86 places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ROL

55.03

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.06
Q3
35.30
Median
21.86
Q1
16.24
Min
6.18

A P/E Ratio of 55.03 places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PKG

2.02

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.14
Median
0.89
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

PKG’s P/S Ratio of 2.02 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ROL

7.71

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.55
Q3
3.15
Median
1.07
Q1
0.68
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.71, ROL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

4.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.85
Median
2.17
Q1
1.46
Min
0.76

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 4.12 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ROL

18.58

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.18
Q3
4.19
Median
2.44
Q1
1.61
Min
0.40

At 18.58, ROL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PKG vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPKGROL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.8655.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.027.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.1218.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.5442.06