Seek Returns logo

PKG vs. RL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PKG and RL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPKGRL
Company NamePackaging Corporation of AmericaRalph Lauren Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization19.61 billion USD18.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 28, 2000June 12, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PKG and RL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PKG vs. RL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPKGRL
5-Day Price Return2.70%3.32%
13-Week Price Return12.93%6.91%
26-Week Price Return2.50%10.72%
52-Week Price Return6.28%75.21%
Month-to-Date Return12.50%-0.61%
Year-to-Date Return-3.18%28.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.04M0.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.77M0.72M
3-Month Volatility26.04%27.01%
Beta0.951.65

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PKG

20.33%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

PKG’s Return on Equity of 20.33% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RL

29.90%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 29.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RL

10.49%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RL

13.17%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.17% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPKGRL
Return on Equity (TTM)20.33%29.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.16%10.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.47%10.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.39%13.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.13%68.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

3.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

RL

1.78

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.78 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

0.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RL

0.54

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPKGRL
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.541.78
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.211.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.540.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)26.7185.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

PKG vs. RL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PKG vs. RL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PKG

2.53%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RL

1.16%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.16% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PKG

49.67%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.67% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RL

27.07%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.07% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPKGRL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.53%1.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)49.67%27.07%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PKG

19.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

PKG’s P/E Ratio of 19.67 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RL

23.39

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

RL’s P/E Ratio of 23.39 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PKG

2.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

PKG’s P/S Ratio of 2.06 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RL

2.45

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.45 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PKG

3.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RL

5.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

RL’s P/B Ratio of 5.27 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PKG vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPKGRL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.6723.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.062.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.665.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.5417.05