Seek Returns logo

PHM vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PHM and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PHM is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolPHMVIPS
Company NamePulteGroup, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization24.97 billion USD8.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PHM and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PHM vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIPS
5-Day Price Return-1.56%-3.87%
13-Week Price Return22.77%7.69%
26-Week Price Return18.59%7.62%
52-Week Price Return1.09%18.83%
Month-to-Date Return12.06%10.40%
Year-to-Date Return16.20%23.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.01M3.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.04M3.29M
3-Month Volatility38.76%30.95%
Beta1.310.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PHM

22.59%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Return on Equity of 22.59% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PHM

15.50%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.50% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PHM

20.22%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.22% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)22.59%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.84%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.50%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.22%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.81%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

4.93

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

PHM’s Current Ratio of 4.93 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

0.17

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PHM

41.50

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

PHM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.931.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.421.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.170.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)41.50150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

PHM vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PHM vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PHM

0.67%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PHM

6.30%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.30% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.30%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PHM

9.37

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

PHM’s P/E Ratio of 9.37 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PHM

1.45

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

PHM’s P/S Ratio of 1.45 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

1.68

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

PHM’s P/B Ratio of 1.68 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PHM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.377.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.450.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.681.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.50--