Seek Returns logo

PHM vs. VIK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PHM and VIK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPHMVIK
Company NamePulteGroup, Inc.Viking Holdings Ltd
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization26.52 billion USD26.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 1, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PHM and VIK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PHM vs. VIK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIK
5-Day Price Return0.94%3.24%
13-Week Price Return25.29%16.64%
26-Week Price Return25.58%49.67%
52-Week Price Return-7.71%77.85%
Month-to-Date Return0.08%-2.29%
Year-to-Date Return21.33%41.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.15M2.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.08M2.98M
3-Month Volatility38.17%23.15%
Beta1.281.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PHM

22.59%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Return on Equity of 22.59% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIK

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

Return on Equity data for VIK is currently unavailable.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PHM

15.50%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.50% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIK

14.20%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

VIK’s Net Profit Margin of 14.20% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PHM

20.22%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.22% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIK

21.61%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

VIK’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.61% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIK
Return on Equity (TTM)22.59%--
Return on Assets (TTM)15.84%7.95%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.50%14.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.22%21.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.81%42.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

4.93

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

PHM’s Current Ratio of 4.93 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VIK

0.64

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

VIK’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

0.17

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIK

20.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.33, VIK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PHM

41.50

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

PHM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIK

1.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

VIK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIK
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.930.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.420.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.1720.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)41.501.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

PHM vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PHM vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PHM

0.66%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PHM

6.30%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.30% is in the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.30%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PHM

9.61

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

In the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s P/E Ratio of 9.61 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VIK

32.52

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

VIK’s P/E Ratio of 32.52 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PHM

1.49

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

PHM’s P/S Ratio of 1.49 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIK

4.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

VIK’s P/S Ratio of 4.62 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

1.68

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

PHM’s P/B Ratio of 1.68 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIK

84.85

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

At 84.85, VIK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PHM vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPHMVIK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.6132.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.494.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.6884.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.9918.90