Seek Returns logo

PHM vs. TCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PHM and TCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PHM is a standard domestic listing, while TCOM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolPHMTCOM
Company NamePulteGroup, Inc.Trip.com Group Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization26.10 billion USD43.15 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 9, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PHM and TCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PHM vs. TCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPHMTCOM
5-Day Price Return1.47%2.18%
13-Week Price Return34.19%6.52%
26-Week Price Return26.15%-3.82%
52-Week Price Return2.37%24.59%
Month-to-Date Return17.14%4.88%
Year-to-Date Return21.47%-4.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.28M2.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.05M2.43M
3-Month Volatility39.49%27.15%
Beta1.321.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PHM

22.59%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Return on Equity of 22.59% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TCOM

12.21%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

TCOM’s Return on Equity of 12.21% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PHM

15.50%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.50% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TCOM

32.02%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

TCOM’s Net Profit Margin of 32.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PHM

20.22%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.22% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TCOM

26.60%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.60% places TCOM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPHMTCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)22.59%12.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.84%6.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.50%32.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.22%26.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.81%81.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

4.93

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

PHM’s Current Ratio of 4.93 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TCOM

1.46

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

TCOM’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

0.17

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TCOM

0.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

TCOM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PHM

41.50

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

PHM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TCOM

9.43

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

TCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPHMTCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.931.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.421.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.170.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)41.509.43

Growth

Revenue Growth

PHM vs. TCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PHM vs. TCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PHM

0.67%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TCOM

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PHM

6.30%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.30% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TCOM

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPHMTCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.30%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PHM

9.37

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

PHM’s P/E Ratio of 9.37 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TCOM

17.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

TCOM’s P/E Ratio of 17.95 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PHM

1.45

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

PHM’s P/S Ratio of 1.45 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TCOM

5.74

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

TCOM’s P/S Ratio of 5.74 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

1.68

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

PHM’s P/B Ratio of 1.68 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TCOM

2.13

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

TCOM’s P/B Ratio of 2.13 is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PHM vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPHMTCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.3717.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.455.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.682.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.50--