Seek Returns logo

PHM vs. PKG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PHM and PKG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPHMPKG
Company NamePulteGroup, Inc.Packaging Corporation of America
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization25.85 billion USD18.96 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980January 28, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PHM and PKG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PHM vs. PKG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPHMPKG
5-Day Price Return4.51%0.16%
13-Week Price Return30.29%8.70%
26-Week Price Return27.08%1.33%
52-Week Price Return-1.95%3.08%
Month-to-Date Return16.04%8.74%
Year-to-Date Return20.32%-6.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.11M0.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.05M0.77M
3-Month Volatility39.51%25.73%
Beta1.320.95

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PHM

22.59%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Return on Equity of 22.59% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PKG

20.33%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

PKG’s Return on Equity of 20.33% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PHM

15.50%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.50% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PHM

20.22%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.22% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPHMPKG
Return on Equity (TTM)22.59%20.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.84%10.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.50%10.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.22%14.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.81%22.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

4.93

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

PHM’s Current Ratio of 4.93 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PKG

3.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

0.17

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PKG

0.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PHM

41.50

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

PHM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPHMPKG
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.933.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.422.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.170.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)41.5026.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

PHM vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PHM vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PHM

0.67%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PKG

2.53%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PHM

6.30%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.30% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PKG

49.67%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.67% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPHMPKG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.30%49.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PHM

9.37

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

PHM’s P/E Ratio of 9.37 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PKG

19.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

PKG’s P/E Ratio of 19.67 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PHM

1.45

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

PHM’s P/S Ratio of 1.45 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PKG

2.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

PKG’s P/S Ratio of 2.06 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PHM

1.68

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

PHM’s P/B Ratio of 1.68 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PKG

3.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PHM vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPHMPKG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.3719.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.452.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.683.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.5028.54