PHG vs. PODD: Koninklijke Philips vs. Insulet Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD) are both classified in the Health Care Equipment sub-industry within the broader Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Insulet (PODD) trades as ordinary local shares, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD)
Profile Item	PHG	PODD
Name	Koninklijke Philips N.V. ADR	Insulet Corporation
Country/Region	Netherlands	United States
GICS Sector	Health Care	Health Care
GICS Industry Group	Health Care Equipment & Services	Health Care Equipment & Services
GICS Industry	Health Care Equipment & Supplies	Health Care Equipment & Supplies
GICS Sub-Industry	Health Care Equipment	Health Care Equipment
Market Capitalization	29.67 billion USD	10.16 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	Nasdaq
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	May 15, 2007
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

PHG

PODD

GSPC

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD)
Metric	PHG	PODD
Total Return (1Y)	13.15%	-53.25%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	18.95%	-0.74%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	-6.38%	-14.02%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

PHG

PODD

GSPC

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD)
Metric	PHG	PODD
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	29.55%	46.33%
Beta (5Y)	0.65	1.04
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-74.51%	-63.02%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.08M	1.58M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

PHG and PODD are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD)
Metric	PHG	PODD
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.30	-1.24
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.48	-1.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Insulet (PODD) at 28.94% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 8.61% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PODD.

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

8.61%

Max: 47.61%
Q3: 14.36%
PHG: 8.61%
Median: 5.45%
Q1: -10.67%
Min: -47.01%

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

28.94%

Max: 47.61%
PODD: 28.94%
Q3: 14.36%
Median: 5.45%
Q1: -10.67%
Min: -47.01%

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their ROE against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Insulet (PODD) at 13.44% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 5.39%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

5.39%

Max: 29.35%
Q3: 9.33%
PHG: 5.39%
Median: 2.18%
Q1: -6.29%
Min: -28.46%

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

13.44%

Max: 29.35%
PODD: 13.44%
Q3: 9.33%
Median: 2.18%
Q1: -6.29%
Min: -28.46%

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their net margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Insulet (PODD) at 22.54% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 3.76%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

3.76%

Max: 35.43%
Q3: 14.14%
Median: 6.81%
PHG: 3.76%
Q1: -0.28%
Min: -16.29%

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

22.54%

Max: 35.43%
PODD: 22.54%
Q3: 14.14%
Median: 6.81%
Q1: -0.28%
Min: -16.29%

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their operating margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD)
Metric	PHG	PODD
ROE (TTM)	8.61%	28.94%
ROA (TTM)	3.59%	11.40%
Net Margin (TTM)	5.39%	13.44%
Operating Margin (TTM)	3.76%	22.54%
Gross Margin (TTM)	46.43%	71.88%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Insulet (PODD) at 30.73% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at -1.04% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Insulet (PODD) reports EPS growth of -39.79%, ranked against its industry; Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD)
Metric	PHG	PODD
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-1.04%	30.73%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	0.01%	27.54%
EPS Growth (YoY)	--	-39.79%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	267.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Insulet (PODD) at 2.51 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.33 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PHG.

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.33

Max: 7.59
Q3: 4.00
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.37
PHG: 1.33
Min: 0.30

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

2.51

Max: 7.59
Q3: 4.00
PODD: 2.51
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.37
Min: 0.30

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their current ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 0.70 and Insulet (PODD) at 0.66 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.70

Max: 1.88
Q3: 0.91
PHG: 0.70
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.16
Min: 0.00

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.66

Max: 1.88
Q3: 0.91
PODD: 0.66
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.16
Min: 0.00

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD)
Metric	PHG	PODD
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.33	2.51
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.70	0.66
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.45	0.65

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Neither Koninklijke Philips (PHG) nor Insulet (PODD) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

PHG: 0.00%
Max: 0.00%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

PODD: 0.00%
Max: 0.00%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 211.79%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; Insulet (PODD) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

211.79%

PHG: 211.79%
Max: 0.00%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

PODD: 0.00%
Max: 0.00%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD)
Metric	PHG	PODD
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	211.79%	0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Insulet (PODD) at 23.94 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 63.23 sits in the richer quartile — PHG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

63.23

Max: 80.41
PHG: 63.23
Q3: 47.62
Median: 29.93
Q1: 21.19
Min: 4.21

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

23.94

Max: 80.41
Q3: 47.62
Median: 29.93
PODD: 23.94
Q1: 21.19
Min: 4.21

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.67 and Insulet (PODD) at 3.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.67

Max: 8.80
Q3: 4.32
Median: 2.13
PHG: 1.67
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.03

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

3.19

Max: 8.80
Q3: 4.32
PODD: 3.19
Median: 2.13
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.03

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 2.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Insulet (PODD) at 6.44 carries an above-peer premium to book — PODD is pricier on assets.

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

2.28

Max: 11.68
Q3: 6.12
Median: 3.00
PHG: 2.28
Q1: 1.73
Min: -1.31

PODD

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

6.44

Max: 11.68
PODD: 6.44
Q3: 6.12
Median: 3.00
Q1: 1.73
Min: -1.31

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) vs. Insulet (PODD): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Insulet (PODD)
Metric	PHG	PODD
P/E Ratio (TTM)	63.23	23.94
P/S Ratio (TTM)	1.67	3.19
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	2.28	6.44
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	6.23%	1.12%