Seek Returns logo

PG vs. TMUS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PG and TMUS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPGTMUS
Company NameThe Procter & Gamble CompanyT-Mobile US, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization373.63 billion USD291.50 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962April 19, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PG and TMUS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PG vs. TMUS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPGTMUS
5-Day Price Return3.75%3.48%
13-Week Price Return-3.19%6.04%
26-Week Price Return-6.73%-2.29%
52-Week Price Return-5.29%31.09%
Month-to-Date Return6.01%8.64%
Year-to-Date Return-4.86%17.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.01M3.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.20M4.42M
3-Month Volatility14.84%23.46%
Beta0.370.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PG

30.78%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.78% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TMUS

19.69%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, TMUS’s Return on Equity of 19.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PG

18.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.95% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TMUS

14.53%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.53% places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PG

23.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

TMUS

23.08%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

TMUS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPGTMUS
Return on Equity (TTM)30.78%19.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.85%5.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.95%14.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.32%23.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.34%63.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PG

0.70

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TMUS

1.21

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

TMUS’s Current Ratio of 1.21 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PG

0.66

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TMUS

1.45

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

TMUS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TMUS

5.31

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

TMUS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPGTMUS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.701.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.441.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.661.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)47.045.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

PG vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PG vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PG

2.64%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.64% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TMUS

1.29%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PG

61.80%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TMUS

30.87%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.87% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPGTMUS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.64%1.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.80%30.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PG

23.40

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 23.40 places PG in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TMUS

23.93

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

A P/E Ratio of 23.93 places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PG

4.43

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TMUS

3.48

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

With a P/S Ratio of 3.48, TMUS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PG

7.14

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.14 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TMUS

4.43

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

TMUS’s P/B Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper tier for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PG vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPGTMUS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.4023.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.433.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.144.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.6123.69