Seek Returns logo

PG vs. SJM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PG and SJM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPGSJM
Company NameThe Procter & Gamble CompanyThe J. M. Smucker Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization371.66 billion USD12.06 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 31, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PG and SJM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PG vs. SJM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPGSJM
5-Day Price Return1.89%1.44%
13-Week Price Return-4.09%-0.34%
26-Week Price Return-4.09%7.49%
52-Week Price Return-6.75%-6.52%
Month-to-Date Return5.45%5.32%
Year-to-Date Return-5.36%2.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.97M1.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.13M1.77M
3-Month Volatility14.70%38.49%
Beta0.370.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PG

30.78%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.78% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SJM

-17.34%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

SJM has a negative Return on Equity of -17.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PG

18.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.95% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SJM

-14.10%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

SJM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.10%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PG

23.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

SJM

-7.38%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

SJM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -7.38%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPGSJM
Return on Equity (TTM)30.78%-17.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.85%-6.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.95%-14.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.32%-7.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.34%38.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PG

0.70

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SJM

0.81

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

SJM’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PG

0.66

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SJM

1.26

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

SJM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.26. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SJM

-1.69

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

SJM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.69. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPGSJM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.700.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.440.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.661.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)47.04-1.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

PG vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PG vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PG

2.64%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.64% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SJM

3.79%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Yield of 3.79% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PG

61.80%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SJM

59.47%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.47% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPGSJM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.64%3.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.80%59.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PG

23.40

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 23.40 places PG in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SJM

--

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

P/E Ratio data for SJM is currently unavailable.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PG

4.43

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SJM

1.38

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

SJM’s P/S Ratio of 1.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PG

7.14

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.14 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SJM

2.03

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

SJM’s P/B Ratio of 2.03 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PG vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPGSJM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.40--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.431.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.142.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.6114.70