Seek Returns

Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM)

This page compares Procter & Gamble (PG) with Philip Morris International (PM) using historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation metrics.

Company Profile

Procter & Gamble (PG) and Philip Morris International (PM) share the Consumer Staples sector but sit in different industry groups — PG in Household & Personal Products and PM in Food, Beverage & Tobacco.

SymbolPGPM
Company NameThe Procter & Gamble CompanyPhilip Morris International Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS Industry GroupHousehold & Personal ProductsFood, Beverage & Tobacco
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsTobacco
GICS Sub-IndustryHousehold ProductsTobacco
Market Capitalization333.92 billion USD293.73 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

PG
PM
Loading price history…
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPGPM
5-Day Price Return1.29%-0.61%
13-Week Price Return-9.56%2.70%
26-Week Price Return-3.08%21.47%
52-Week Price Return-13.32%7.91%
Month-to-Date Return-2.51%14.17%
Year-to-Date Return0.06%17.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.64M5.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.45M5.20M
3-Month Volatility21.38%34.48%
Beta0.400.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

Philip Morris International (PM) posts Return on Equity (TTM) of 575.44%, above its industry benchmark range, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 31.23% sits closer to the industry mid-range.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

31.23%

Max
56.82%
Q3
44.03%
Median
14.83%
Q1
8.27%
Min
-15.43%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

575.44%

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.49%
Median
11.74%
Q1
4.10%
Min
-21.55%
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

Both Procter & Gamble (PG) at 19.16% and Philip Morris International (PM) at 26.74% rank in the top quartile for Net Profit Margin (TTM) among industry peers, indicating both companies convert revenue into net income more strongly than typical competitors.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

19.16%

Max
19.16%
Q3
11.57%
Median
6.87%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-5.39%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

26.74%

Max
27.80%
Q3
12.39%
Median
5.93%
Q1
1.61%
Min
-14.07%
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Philip Morris International (PM) leads with Operating Profit Margin (TTM) of 36.73%, above its industry benchmark range, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 23.59% also ranks strongly in the top quartile.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

23.59%

Max
23.59%
Q3
16.82%
Median
11.03%
Q1
4.90%
Min
-6.14%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

36.73%

Max
30.01%
Q3
15.34%
Median
8.52%
Q1
3.58%
Min
-9.05%
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPGPM
Return on Equity (TTM)31.23%575.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.07%16.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.16%26.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.59%36.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.88%67.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.73 and Philip Morris International (PM) at 0.98 run Current Ratio (MRQ) in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.73

Max
4.51
Q3
2.63
Median
1.79
Q1
0.95
Min
0.73

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.98

Max
4.41
Q3
2.60
Median
1.55
Q1
1.01
Min
0.45
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.68 is around its industry mid-range for Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ), while Philip Morris International (PM) at 186.08 sits above its industry benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.68

Max
1.83
Q3
1.83
Median
0.76
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

186.08

Max
2.65
Q3
1.32
Median
0.77
Q1
0.33
Min
0.00
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) posts Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) of 47.04, above its industry benchmark range, while Philip Morris International (PM) at 15.37 sits closer to the industry mid-range.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

47.04

Max
34.29
Q3
17.39
Median
8.17
Q1
3.35
Min
-3.28

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

15.37

Max
33.34
Q3
18.06
Median
6.63
Q1
2.93
Min
-11.45
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPGPM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.730.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.490.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.68186.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)47.0415.37

Growth

Revenue Growth

Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolPGPM
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)7.38%9.09%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)3.33%8.09%
3-Year Revenue CAGR1.67%8.57%
5-Year Revenue CAGR3.50%7.21%

EPS Growth

Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolPGPM
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)5.73%-9.49%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)8.59%45.86%
3-Year EPS CAGR3.88%7.70%
5-Year EPS CAGR5.58%7.09%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.05% and Philip Morris International (PM) at 3.00% report Dividend Yield (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on cash yield relative to share price.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

3.05%

Max
7.23%
Q3
3.86%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.00%

Max
10.52%
Q3
4.54%
Median
3.03%
Q1
0.49%
Min
0.00%
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Procter & Gamble (PG) at 61.24% and Philip Morris International (PM) at 79.44% maintain Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) around their industries’ median — balanced dividend policy on both sides, returning cash while leaving part of reported earnings available for reinvestment or balance-sheet flexibility.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

61.24%

Max
127.85%
Q3
61.48%
Median
36.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

79.44%

Max
195.44%
Q3
88.50%
Median
60.35%
Q1
14.76%
Min
0.00%
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPGPM
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.05%3.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.24%79.44%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

Both Procter & Gamble (PG) at 20.09 and Philip Morris International (PM) at 26.47 post Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on trailing earnings multiple.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

20.09

Max
36.35
Q3
25.16
Median
17.16
Q1
13.97
Min
5.49

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

26.47

Max
43.72
Q3
27.60
Median
18.51
Q1
12.63
Min
1.67
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.85 sits in the higher-multiple quartile for Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM), but Philip Morris International (PM) at 7.08 is higher still, above its industry benchmark range — both carry elevated trailing revenue multiples relative to peers, with PM higher.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

3.85

Max
3.85
Q3
2.11
Median
1.74
Q1
0.71
Min
0.26

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

7.08

Max
5.24
Q3
2.62
Median
1.12
Q1
0.62
Min
0.15
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 6.17 hovers around the typical industry Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ), while Philip Morris International (PM) at 1,368.86 sits above its industry benchmark range — an elevated book-value multiple for PM relative to peers.

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

6.17

Max
12.04
Q3
7.19
Median
3.30
Q1
1.57
Min
0.57

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

1,368.86

Max
6.13
Q3
3.53
Median
2.25
Q1
1.25
Min
0.63
Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM): A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household & Personal Products and Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPGPM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.0926.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.857.08
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.171,368.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.2225.72