PDD vs. WSM: PDD vs. Williams-Sonoma Stock Comparison

Company Profile

PDD (PDD) and Williams-Sonoma (WSM) both fall under the Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail industry group, but PDD is classified in Broadline Retail while WSM is classified in Specialty Retail.

Williams-Sonoma (WSM) trades as ordinary local shares, while PDD (PDD) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

PDD (PDD) reports a negative beta of -0.08, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Williams-Sonoma (WSM) has a non-negative beta of 1.48.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 54.96% sits in the top ROE quartile, while PDD (PDD) at 22.75% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for WSM.

PDD (PDD) at 20.43% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 14.73% also retains a top-quartile share.

PDD (PDD) at 24.71% shows unusually strong operating efficiency — above its industry’s operating margin range — and Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 17.27% also operates in the top quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both PDD (PDD) at 9.65% and Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 1.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both PDD (PDD) at -11.79% and Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 0.57% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 1.45 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while PDD (PDD) at 2.62 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both PDD (PDD) at 0.01 and Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 0.71 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

PDD (PDD) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Williams-Sonoma (WSM) reports a yield of 1.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.

PDD (PDD) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Williams-Sonoma (WSM) reports a payout of 29.13%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

PDD (PDD) at 9.34 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 26.06 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

PDD (PDD) at 0.26 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 3.74 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

PDD (PDD) at 1.74 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Williams-Sonoma (WSM) at 13.98 prices above its benchmark range — WSM looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics