Seek Returns

PCG vs. SBS: PG&E vs. Sabesp Stock Comparison

How do PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but PCG is classified in Electric Utilities while SBS is classified in Water Utilities.

PG&E (PCG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Sabesp (SBS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS)
Profile ItemPCGSBS
NamePG&E CorporationCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesBrazil
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS Industry GroupUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesWater Utilities
GICS Sub-IndustryElectric UtilitiesWater Utilities
Market Capitalization28.57 billion USD16.96 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972May 10, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

PCG
SBS
GSPC
Loading price history…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS)
MetricPCGSBS
Total Return (1Y)-19.03%-3.72%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-6.50%28.33%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)2.05%32.85%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

PCG
SBS
GSPC
Loading price history…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS)
MetricPCGSBS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)34.84%46.80%
Beta (5Y)0.170.76
Max Drawdown (5Y)-43.92%-37.59%
Avg. Volume (3M)39.33M11.85M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
PCG and SBS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS)
MetricPCGSBS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.67-0.17
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.81-0.22

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Sabesp (SBS) at 16.27% sits in the top ROE quartile, while PG&E (PCG) at 8.89% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for SBS.

PCG

Utilities industry group

8.89%

Max
17.99%
Q3
12.01%
Median
9.44%
PCG
8.89%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%

SBS

Utilities industry group

16.27%

Max
17.99%
SBS
16.27%
Q3
12.01%
Median
9.44%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their ROE against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Sabesp (SBS) at 17.52% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of PG&E (PCG) at 11.57%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

PCG

Utilities industry group

11.57%

Max
28.78%
Q3
17.30%
Median
12.73%
PCG
11.57%
Q1
9.18%
Min
-0.20%

SBS

Utilities industry group

17.52%

Max
28.78%
SBS
17.52%
Q3
17.30%
Median
12.73%
Q1
9.18%
Min
-0.20%
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their net margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both PG&E (PCG) at 23.64% and Sabesp (SBS) at 29.28% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

PCG

Utilities industry group

23.64%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
PCG
23.64%
Median
23.62%
Q1
15.45%
Min
-4.90%

SBS

Utilities industry group

29.28%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
SBS
29.28%
Median
23.62%
Q1
15.45%
Min
-4.90%
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS)
MetricPCGSBS
ROE (TTM)8.89%16.27%
ROA (TTM)2.59%8.08%
Net Margin (TTM)11.57%17.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)23.64%29.28%
Gross Margin (TTM)40.57%36.96%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Sabesp (SBS) at 5.39% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while PG&E (PCG) at 2.11% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

PG&E (PCG) at 2.61% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Sabesp (SBS) at -11.79% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS)
MetricPCGSBS
Revenue Growth (YoY)2.11%5.39%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)4.77%19.98%
EPS Growth (YoY)2.61%-11.79%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)12.00%40.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PG&E (PCG) at 1.03 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sabesp (SBS) at 1.22 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

PCG

Utilities industry group

1.03

Max
1.90
Q3
1.17
PCG
1.03
Median
0.88
Q1
0.66
Min
0.29

SBS

Utilities industry group

1.22

Max
1.90
SBS
1.22
Q3
1.17
Median
0.88
Q1
0.66
Min
0.29
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Sabesp (SBS) at 0.99 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while PG&E (PCG) at 1.88 uses more debt funding than most peers.

PCG

Utilities industry group

1.88

Max
2.63
PCG
1.88
Q3
1.77
Median
1.35
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00

SBS

Utilities industry group

0.99

Max
2.63
Q3
1.77
Median
1.35
SBS
0.99
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS)
MetricPCGSBS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.031.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.880.99
Net Debt / EBITDA6.052.30

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Sabesp (SBS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile PG&E (PCG) reports a yield of 1.51%, ranking against industry peers normally.

PCG

Utilities industry group

1.51%

Max
6.66%
Q3
3.58%
Median
2.85%
PCG
1.51%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

SBS

Utilities industry group

0.00%

Max
6.66%
Q3
3.58%
Median
2.85%
Q1
0.66%
SBS
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Sabesp (SBS) at 35.95% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; PG&E (PCG) at 14.81% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.

PCG

Utilities industry group

14.81%

Max
113.04%
Q3
68.72%
Median
56.38%
Q1
32.38%
PCG
14.81%
Min
0.00%

SBS

Utilities industry group

35.95%

Max
113.04%
Q3
68.72%
Median
56.38%
SBS
35.95%
Q1
32.38%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS)
MetricPCGSBS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.51%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.81%35.95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both PG&E (PCG) at 9.61 and Sabesp (SBS) at 11.73 sit in the cheaper earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, with the market paying less for a dollar of trailing earnings than it pays for typical peers.

PCG

Utilities industry group

9.61

Max
31.22
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
Q1
15.17
PCG
9.61
Min
3.34

SBS

Utilities industry group

11.73

Max
31.22
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
Q1
15.17
SBS
11.73
Min
3.34
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both PG&E (PCG) at 1.11 and Sabesp (SBS) at 0.41 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

PCG

Utilities industry group

1.11

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
Median
2.63
Q1
1.52
PCG
1.11
Min
0.00

SBS

Utilities industry group

0.41

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
Median
2.63
Q1
1.52
SBS
0.41
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

PG&E (PCG) at 0.87 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Sabesp (SBS) at 1.84 is valued near its industry’s middle — PCG is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

PCG

Utilities industry group

0.87

Max
3.12
Q3
2.21
Median
1.83
Q1
1.46
PCG
0.87
Min
0.34

SBS

Utilities industry group

1.84

Max
3.12
Q3
2.21
SBS
1.84
Median
1.83
Q1
1.46
Min
0.34
Loading chart…
PG&E (PCG) vs. Sabesp (SBS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for PG&E (PCG) and Sabesp (SBS)
MetricPCGSBS
P/E Ratio (TTM)9.6111.73
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.110.41
P/B Ratio (MRQ)0.871.84
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)-22.73%-62.11%