Seek Returns logo

PCAR vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PCAR and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPCARPWR
Company NamePACCAR IncQuanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization52.77 billion USD62.68 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PCAR and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PCAR vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPCARPWR
5-Day Price Return1.48%5.05%
13-Week Price Return3.43%12.99%
26-Week Price Return-1.22%65.04%
52-Week Price Return0.19%41.09%
Month-to-Date Return-1.66%1.50%
Year-to-Date Return-5.48%33.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.74M1.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.77M1.06M
3-Month Volatility27.57%25.26%
Beta0.961.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PCAR

16.81%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

PCAR’s Return on Equity of 16.81% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PCAR

9.88%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

PCAR’s Net Profit Margin of 9.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PCAR

14.86%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

PCAR’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.86% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPCARPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)16.81%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.08%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.88%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.86%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.19%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PCAR

1.64

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

PCAR’s Current Ratio of 1.64 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PCAR

0.84

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

PCAR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Machinery industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.84. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PCAR

27.70

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

PCAR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 27.70 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPCARPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.641.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.241.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.840.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)27.7010.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

PCAR vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PCAR vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PCAR

4.34%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.34%, PCAR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Machinery industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PWR

0.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PCAR

72.73%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

PCAR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 72.73% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPCARPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.34%0.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)72.73%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PCAR

16.75

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

PCAR’s P/E Ratio of 16.75 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

62.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 62.54, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PCAR

1.66

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

PCAR’s P/S Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PWR

2.33

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.33 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PCAR

2.63

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

PCAR’s P/B Ratio of 2.63 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.13 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PCAR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPCARPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.7562.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.662.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.637.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.8844.74