Seek Returns logo

PAYC vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PAYC and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPAYCZM
Company NamePaycom Software, Inc.Zoom Communications Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization12.24 billion USD25.29 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 15, 2014April 18, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PAYC and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PAYC vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPAYCZM
5-Day Price Return-4.27%-3.23%
13-Week Price Return-10.05%4.78%
26-Week Price Return-6.55%5.86%
52-Week Price Return24.04%16.55%
Month-to-Date Return-8.37%-1.48%
Year-to-Date Return1.55%-0.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.78M3.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.63M3.21M
3-Month Volatility29.85%34.63%
Beta0.890.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PAYC

25.35%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

PAYC’s Return on Equity of 25.35% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZM

13.40%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PAYC

21.21%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.21% places PAYC in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZM

24.99%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.99% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PAYC

28.10%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.10% places PAYC in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZM

20.43%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.43% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPAYCZM
Return on Equity (TTM)25.35%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.26%10.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.21%24.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.10%20.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.44%76.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PAYC

1.30

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

PAYC’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZM

4.45

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.45 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PAYC

0.00

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, PAYC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PAYC

191.88

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 191.88, PAYC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPAYCZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.304.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.274.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)191.887.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

PAYC vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PAYC vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PAYC

0.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

PAYC’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PAYC

20.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

PAYC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.52% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPAYCZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.71%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.52%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PAYC

28.98

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

PAYC’s P/E Ratio of 28.98 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZM

21.32

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PAYC

6.15

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

PAYC’s P/S Ratio of 6.15 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZM

5.33

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ZM’s P/S Ratio of 5.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PAYC

7.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

PAYC’s P/B Ratio of 7.19 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ZM

2.50

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PAYC vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPAYCZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.9821.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.155.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.192.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.9513.73