Seek Returns logo

PAYC vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PAYC and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolPAYCUBER
Company NamePaycom Software, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization12.82 billion USD198.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 15, 2014May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PAYC and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PAYC vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPAYCUBER
5-Day Price Return1.14%1.17%
13-Week Price Return-12.77%7.11%
26-Week Price Return6.96%20.84%
52-Week Price Return38.44%31.29%
Month-to-Date Return-1.58%8.64%
Year-to-Date Return11.18%58.04%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.61M15.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.60M20.41M
3-Month Volatility30.58%29.53%
Beta0.841.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PAYC

25.35%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

PAYC’s Return on Equity of 25.35% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PAYC

21.21%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.21% places PAYC in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PAYC

28.10%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.10% places PAYC in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPAYCUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)25.35%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.26%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.21%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.10%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.44%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PAYC

1.30

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

PAYC’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PAYC

0.00

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, PAYC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PAYC

191.88

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 191.88, PAYC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPAYCUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.301.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.270.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)191.88-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

PAYC vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PAYC vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PAYC

0.65%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

PAYC’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PAYC

20.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

PAYC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.52% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPAYCUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.65%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.52%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PAYC

31.73

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

PAYC’s P/E Ratio of 31.73 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PAYC

6.73

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

PAYC’s P/S Ratio of 6.73 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PAYC

7.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

PAYC’s P/B Ratio of 7.19 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAYC vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPAYCUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.7315.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.734.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.198.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)37.1822.90