Seek Returns logo

PAM vs. VST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PAM and VST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PAM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, VST is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolPAMVST
Company NamePampa Energía S.A.Vistra Corp.
CountryArgentinaUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers
Market Capitalization3.55 billion USD69.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 9, 2009October 5, 2016
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PAM and VST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PAM vs. VST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPAMVST
5-Day Price Return--1.92%
13-Week Price Return--4.84%
26-Week Price Return--90.88%
52-Week Price Return--57.35%
Month-to-Date Return--5.43%
Year-to-Date Return--49.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume--4.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume--4.83M
3-Month Volatility--42.19%
Beta--1.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PAM

15.54%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
25.46%
Q3
14.70%
Median
10.64%
Q1
6.99%
Min
0.02%

In the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, PAM’s Return on Equity of 15.54% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VST

46.24%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
25.91%
Q3
13.69%
Median
7.86%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-6.69%

VST’s Return on Equity of 46.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PAM

27.44%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.56%
Q3
16.54%
Median
11.20%
Q1
7.30%
Min
0.01%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.44% places PAM in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VST

14.92%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
23.58%
Q3
14.30%
Median
8.59%
Q1
5.08%
Min
-2.06%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PAM

24.12%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
38.77%
Q3
25.54%
Median
18.87%
Q1
14.12%
Min
0.02%

PAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 24.12% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VST

22.38%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
31.45%
Q3
22.28%
Median
16.08%
Q1
11.37%
Min
4.97%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.38% places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPAMVST
Return on Equity (TTM)15.54%46.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.44%6.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.44%14.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.12%22.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.91%8.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PAM

1.82

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.23
Median
0.98
Q1
0.72
Min
0.13

PAM’s Current Ratio of 1.82 is in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VST

0.90

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.25
Median
0.81
Q1
0.66
Min
0.27

VST’s Current Ratio of 0.90 aligns with the median group of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PAM

0.49

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.90
Median
1.27
Q1
0.62
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, PAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.49 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VST

4.00

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
4.71
Q3
2.80
Median
1.91
Q1
1.17
Min
0.18

VST’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PAM

15.63

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
9.89
Median
3.33
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

PAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.63 is in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VST

5.47

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
10.03
Q3
7.41
Median
2.59
Q1
1.32
Min
-1.62

VST’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPAMVST
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.820.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.570.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.494.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.635.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

PAM vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PAM vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PAM

0.00%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.61%
Q3
4.66%
Median
3.55%
Q1
2.23%
Min
0.00%

PAM’s Dividend Yield of 0.00% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VST

0.72%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
5.56%
Median
3.97%
Q1
2.26%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PAM

0.04%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
140.33%
Q3
84.46%
Median
60.94%
Q1
31.83%
Min
0.00%

PAM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.04% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VST

14.95%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
113.12%
Q3
82.87%
Median
49.83%
Q1
22.46%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.95% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPAMVST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.04%14.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PAM

10.14

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
34.39
Q3
21.23
Median
15.47
Q1
10.17
Min
3.08

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, PAM’s P/E Ratio of 10.14 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VST

29.07

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
43.87
Q3
23.80
Median
10.75
Q1
8.70
Min
4.34

A P/E Ratio of 29.07 places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PAM

2.78

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.03
Q3
3.06
Median
1.89
Q1
1.06
Min
0.00

PAM’s P/S Ratio of 2.78 aligns with the market consensus for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VST

4.34

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.59
Q3
3.75
Median
2.31
Q1
0.81
Min
0.42

VST’s P/S Ratio of 4.34 is in the upper echelon for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PAM

1.48

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.86
Median
1.46
Q1
1.01
Min
0.27

PAM’s P/B Ratio of 1.48 is within the conventional range for the Electric Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VST

13.64

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
2.06
Median
1.40
Q1
0.88
Min
0.33

At 13.64, VST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAM vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPAMVST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.1429.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.784.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.4813.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)37.8844.99