PAC vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at PAC and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, STN is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	PAC	STN
Company Name	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.	Stantec Inc.
Country	Mexico	Canada
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Transportation Infrastructure	Construction & Engineering
Market Capitalization	11.13 billion USD	11.48 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 27, 2006	August 5, 2005
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PAC and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PAC vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	STN
5-Day Price Return	3.15%	-0.77%
13-Week Price Return	-13.20%	1.24%
26-Week Price Return	-5.98%	13.66%
52-Week Price Return	11.39%	27.45%
Month-to-Date Return	5.22%	-4.31%
Year-to-Date Return	10.77%	31.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.87M	0.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.71M	0.31M
3-Month Volatility	23.93%	22.35%
Beta	1.41	1.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PAC

45.58%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 14.62%
Median: 10.37%
Q1: 6.63%
Min: 1.67%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 45.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 26.79%
Q3: 16.67%
Median: 11.05%
Q1: 8.46%
Min: -2.38%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PAC

24.13%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 56.87%
Q3: 31.71%
Median: 20.37%
Q1: 10.09%
Min: 1.22%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 24.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.67%
Q3: 6.49%
Median: 3.88%
Q1: 2.38%
Min: -2.27%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PAC

41.95%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 60.60%
Q3: 47.00%
Median: 32.11%
Q1: 16.08%
Min: 1.73%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 41.95% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.78%
Q3: 9.70%
Median: 5.84%
Q1: 3.94%
Min: -1.78%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	STN
Return on Equity (TTM)	45.58%	15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)	12.14%	6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	24.13%	7.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	41.95%	9.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	100.00%	54.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PAC

1.29

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 2.77
Q3: 1.91
Median: 1.29
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

PAC’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.26
Q3: 1.54
Median: 1.25
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.65

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PAC

2.53

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.23
Q3: 1.64
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.53. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.54
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.64
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 29.26
Q3: 20.45
Median: 7.97
Q1: 4.97
Min: 2.01

PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 30.69
Q3: 15.27
Median: 7.88
Q1: 4.27
Min: -6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	STN
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	1.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	1.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.53	0.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.20	60.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

PAC vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PAC vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PAC

5.32%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 7.92%
Q3: 5.23%
Median: 2.46%
Q1: 1.94%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.32%, PAC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.80%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 1.76%
Q1: 0.17%
Min: 0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PAC

128.34%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 206.16%
Q3: 111.39%
Median: 75.06%
Q1: 37.58%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 128.34% is in the upper quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 144.77%
Q3: 74.39%
Median: 50.47%
Q1: 8.02%
Min: 0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	STN
Dividend Yield (TTM)	5.32%	0.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	128.34%	22.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PAC

17.45

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 37.73
Q3: 26.09
Median: 18.07
Q1: 13.50
Min: 6.41

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 17.45 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STN

38.82

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 39.16
Q3: 24.60
Median: 17.05
Q1: 13.85
Min: 1.65

A P/E Ratio of 38.82 places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PAC

4.21

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 8.65
Q3: 5.45
Median: 3.16
Q1: 1.76
Min: 0.86

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STN

2.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.86
Q3: 1.52
Median: 0.80
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.12

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.76 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PAC

8.66

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.71
Q3: 3.00
Median: 2.04
Q1: 1.16
Min: 0.38

At 8.66, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 7.53
Q3: 3.97
Median: 1.90
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.24

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PAC vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	STN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	17.45	38.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.21	2.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	8.66	4.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	21.74	27.03