PAC vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at PAC and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, PWR is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	PAC	PWR
Company Name	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.	Quanta Services, Inc.
Country	Mexico	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Transportation Infrastructure	Construction & Engineering
Market Capitalization	12.69 billion USD	56.01 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 27, 2006	February 12, 1998
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PAC and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PAC vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	PWR
5-Day Price Return	3.66%	-0.43%
13-Week Price Return	7.17%	9.04%
26-Week Price Return	16.49%	29.23%
52-Week Price Return	54.81%	40.20%
Month-to-Date Return	9.23%	-7.45%
Year-to-Date Return	29.15%	18.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.45M	1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.70M	1.19M
3-Month Volatility	24.85%	22.91%
Beta	1.41	1.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 26.85%
Q3: 15.47%
Median: 10.39%
Q1: 7.70%
Min: 0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 49.26%
Q3: 27.75%
Median: 17.98%
Q1: 10.18%
Min: 4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 60.91%
Q3: 43.57%
Median: 30.58%
Q1: 16.77%
Min: 1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	PWR
Return on Equity (TTM)	42.80%	13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)	11.42%	5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	23.19%	3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	42.29%	5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	100.00%	15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.35
Q3: 1.90
Median: 1.35
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.70
Q3: 1.70
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 29.26
Q3: 20.33
Median: 8.92
Q1: 5.22
Min: 2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	PWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.93	1.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.93	1.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.48	0.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.20	10.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

PAC vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PAC vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 7.48%
Q3: 3.76%
Median: 2.40%
Q1: 1.13%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 197.82%
Q3: 109.11%
Median: 70.69%
Q1: 33.40%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	PWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.53%	0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	71.16%	5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 35.90
Q3: 21.76
Median: 17.41
Q1: 12.31
Min: 5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 10.76
Q3: 5.52
Median: 2.96
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.46
Q3: 2.80
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.12
Min: 0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Transportation Infrastructure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	PAC	PWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	19.76	57.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.58	2.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	9.90	7.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	18.23	40.85