PAAS vs. SHW: Pan American Silver vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do Pan American Silver (PAAS) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Pan American Silver (PAAS) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but PAAS is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | PAAS | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Pan American Silver Corp. | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Silver | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 16.98 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 12, 1995 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | PAAS | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 22.43% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 47.84% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 11.59% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | PAAS | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 58.13% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.39% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.31M | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | PAAS | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.31 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.45 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 22.39% also sits in the top quartile.
PAAS
Materials industry group
22.39%
- Max
- 52.88%
- PAAS
- 22.39%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 35.16% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
PAAS
Materials industry group
35.16%
- Max
- 38.66%
- PAAS
- 35.16%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 34.29% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
PAAS
Materials industry group
34.29%
- Max
- 66.70%
- PAAS
- 34.29%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | PAAS | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 22.39% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 11.27% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 35.16% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 34.29% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 55.17% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 28.38% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 725.81% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | PAAS | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 28.38% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 34.28% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 725.81% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 2.72 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
PAAS
Materials industry group
2.72
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- PAAS
- 2.72
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 0.11 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.
PAAS
Materials industry group
0.11
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- PAAS
- 0.11
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | PAAS | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.72 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.11 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.39 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 1.69% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
PAAS
Materials industry group
1.69%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- PAAS
- 1.69%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 18.00% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
PAAS
Materials industry group
18.00%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- PAAS
- 18.00%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | PAAS | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.69% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 18.00% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 10.83 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for PAAS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
PAAS
Materials industry group
10.83
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- PAAS
- 10.83
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 3.80 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
PAAS
Materials industry group
3.80
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- PAAS
- 3.80
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 2.29 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
PAAS
Materials industry group
2.29
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- PAAS
- 2.29
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PAAS | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.83 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.80 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.29 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 8.01% | 2.98% |