OWL vs. SHG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at OWL and SHG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

OWL is a standard domestic listing, while SHG trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	OWL	SHG
Company Name	Blue Owl Capital Inc.	Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.
Country	United States	South Korea
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Banks
Market Capitalization	28.77 billion USD	23.53 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 14, 2020	September 17, 2003
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of OWL and SHG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

OWL vs. SHG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	OWL	SHG
5-Day Price Return	-5.54%	-3.60%
13-Week Price Return	-4.33%	28.41%
26-Week Price Return	-21.05%	36.25%
52-Week Price Return	3.92%	1.10%
Month-to-Date Return	-4.03%	-1.62%
Year-to-Date Return	-20.16%	40.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume	7.54M	1.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume	7.74M	1.40M
3-Month Volatility	31.07%	36.16%
Beta	1.16	0.78

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

OWL

3.42%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

OWL’s Return on Equity of 3.42% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SHG

8.39%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

SHG’s Return on Equity of 8.39% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

OWL

2.88%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, OWL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SHG

18.67%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, SHG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.67% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

OWL

17.38%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

OWL’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.38% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

SHG

24.63%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

SHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 24.63% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	OWL	SHG
Return on Equity (TTM)	3.42%	8.39%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.65%	0.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.88%	18.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.38%	24.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

OWL

0.88

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

SHG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

OWL

1.38

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

SHG

2.66

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

OWL

5.03

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

SHG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	OWL	SHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.88	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.83	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.38	2.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.03	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

OWL vs. SHG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

OWL vs. SHG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

OWL

1.60%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

OWL’s Dividend Yield of 1.60% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SHG

4.02%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

SHG’s Dividend Yield of 4.02% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

OWL

610.34%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

At 610.34%, OWL’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

SHG

27.06%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

SHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.06% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	OWL	SHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.60%	4.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	610.34%	27.06%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

OWL

381.60

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

At 381.60, OWL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SHG

6.74

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

In the lower quartile for the Banks industry, SHG’s P/E Ratio of 6.74 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

OWL

10.99

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

OWL’s P/S Ratio of 10.99 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SHG

0.83

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

OWL

12.65

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

At 12.65, OWL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Capital Markets industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SHG

0.53

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

SHG’s P/B Ratio of 0.53 is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

OWL vs. SHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	OWL	SHG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	381.60	6.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	10.99	0.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	12.65	0.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	27.63	2.41