OWL vs. RJF: Blue Owl Capital vs. Raymond James Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) and Raymond James Financial (RJF) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though OWL is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while RJF falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Raymond James Financial (RJF) has more than two decades of public-market history since July 1, 1983, whereas Blue Owl Capital (OWL) listed on December 14, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 6.41% and Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 18.73% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 14.97% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.08% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Both Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 31.15% and Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 20.88% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports revenue growth of 25.04%, ranked against its industry; Raymond James Financial (RJF) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 15.63% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services and Raymond James Financial (RJF) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services and Raymond James Financial (RJF) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Raymond James Financial (RJF) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports a yield of 9.66%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 650.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Raymond James Financial (RJF) reports 18.48%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 13.67 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 70.14 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for OWL’s trailing earnings.

Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 1.98 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 sits in the pricier quartile — OWL costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 and Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 2.46 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics