Seek Returns logo

OWL vs. PFG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at OWL and PFG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolOWLPFG
Company NameBlue Owl Capital Inc.Principal Financial Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsInsurance
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD17.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 14, 2020October 23, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of OWL and PFG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

OWL vs. PFG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolOWLPFG
5-Day Price Return5.81%3.62%
13-Week Price Return2.04%-4.11%
26-Week Price Return-19.10%-2.08%
52-Week Price Return18.30%5.31%
Month-to-Date Return3.57%0.66%
Year-to-Date Return-13.84%1.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.33M1.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.35M1.39M
3-Month Volatility33.13%22.69%
Beta1.161.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

OWL

3.42%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

OWL’s Return on Equity of 3.42% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

PFG

10.14%

Insurance Industry

Max
29.03%
Q3
18.11%
Median
13.90%
Q1
10.42%
Min
-0.64%

PFG’s Return on Equity of 10.14% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

OWL

2.88%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, OWL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PFG

7.45%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.06%
Median
9.15%
Q1
5.48%
Min
-7.05%

PFG’s Net Profit Margin of 7.45% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

OWL

17.38%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

OWL’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.38% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PFG

10.56%

Insurance Industry

Max
35.49%
Q3
19.49%
Median
14.35%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolOWLPFG
Return on Equity (TTM)3.42%10.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.65%0.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.88%7.45%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.38%10.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

OWL

0.88

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PFG

--

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.33
Median
0.55
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

OWL

1.38

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

PFG

0.35

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

OWL

5.03

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

PFG

1.66

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
20.84
Median
9.56
Q1
3.34
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolOWLPFG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.88--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.83--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.380.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.031.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

OWL vs. PFG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

OWL vs. PFG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

OWL

1.48%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

OWL’s Dividend Yield of 1.48% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PFG

3.86%

Insurance Industry

Max
8.23%
Q3
4.54%
Median
3.42%
Q1
1.97%
Min
0.00%

PFG’s Dividend Yield of 3.86% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

OWL

610.34%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

At 610.34%, OWL’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

PFG

37.10%

Insurance Industry

Max
168.02%
Q3
85.57%
Median
50.71%
Q1
22.04%
Min
0.00%

PFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.10% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolOWLPFG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.48%3.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)610.34%37.10%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

OWL

411.81

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

At 411.81, OWL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PFG

15.22

Insurance Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
17.76
Median
13.63
Q1
10.02
Min
2.89

PFG’s P/E Ratio of 15.22 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

OWL

11.86

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

OWL’s P/S Ratio of 11.86 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PFG

1.13

Insurance Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
0.81
Min
0.23

PFG’s P/S Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

OWL

12.65

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

At 12.65, OWL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Capital Markets industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PFG

1.56

Insurance Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.48
Median
1.68
Q1
1.19
Min
0.19

PFG’s P/B Ratio of 1.56 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

OWL vs. PFG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolOWLPFG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)411.8115.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.861.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.651.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.814.03